Global society and constitutional fragmentation: the new challenges to the modern constitutionalism
This article deals with a critical interpretation the debate that revolves around the crisis of modern constitutionalism and new dilemmas that arise concerning the constitutional theory in a globalized society and in progressive fragmentation. This is a reading of the work Verfassungsfragmente (2012...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| Repositorio: | Direito.Unb (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24485 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadedireitounb/article/view/24485 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fragmentação constitucional globalização teoria constitucional constitucionalismo societal Constitutional fragments globalization Constitutional theory Societal constitutionalism |
| Sumario: | This article deals with a critical interpretation the debate that revolves around the crisis of modern constitutionalism and new dilemmas that arise concerning the constitutional theory in a globalized society and in progressive fragmentation. This is a reading of the work Verfassungsfragmente (2012) by Gunther Teubner. The article will try to give an overview of the subject, including (i) the historical aspects of the origin of the modern constitution and the functional synthesis between legal system and political system, (ii) the transition of political constitutions for civil constitutions, (iii) a general trends to systemic hypertrophy and the constitutions as mechanisms of reaction to the expansiveness, with special emphasis on societal constitutionalism, (iv) the new constitutional conditions of global society, (v) the fundamental rights and transnational inter-constitutionals collisions, and ending with a (vi) critical about the real possibility of implementing the civil constitutions, with consideration of the risks that can bring a constitutional fragmentation for maintaining the functional autonomy of the social spheres. |
|---|