Divorce, accusations and bonds of solidarity (Belém, 1895-1900)
The following reflections were based on divorce proceedings filed in the city of Belém-PA between 1895 and 1900. In these records it was noted that the formal accusation was not sufficient to the conviction of the defendant in the Court of Justice of the State of Pará then elaborated other imputatio...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
| Repositorio: | Clio (Recife. Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/24544 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/revistaclio/article/view/24544 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Divorce Friends Relatives Solidarity Divórcio Amigos Parentes Solidariedade |
| Sumario: | The following reflections were based on divorce proceedings filed in the city of Belém-PA between 1895 and 1900. In these records it was noted that the formal accusation was not sufficient to the conviction of the defendant in the Court of Justice of the State of Pará then elaborated other imputations and became essential to the possibilities of condemnation and acquittal. Thus, the principal argument focused on thinking that the justice system of the State of Pará, in the webs of divorce proceedings, did not see how prudent an auto should be based only on the formal imputation (on a single charge), it should be plotted with other responsibilities here called accusations. |
|---|