O auxiliar de futuro na sintaxe temporal: por uma projeção que lexicalize verbos no presente
This paper aims to observe and to question the role of the “futuro do presente” auxiliary in periphrasis, in the temporal syntax of Brazilian Portuguese. This study makes considerations about Giorgi and Pianesi (1997), according to their proposition of IP extent in AGRs (AGR1 and AGR2) and TPs (TP1...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| Repositorio: | Caderno de Squibs |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26705 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/cs/article/view/26705 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | sintaxe temporal auxiliar tempo futuro temporal syntax auxiliary future tense |
| Resumo: | This paper aims to observe and to question the role of the “futuro do presente” auxiliary in periphrasis, in the temporal syntax of Brazilian Portuguese. This study makes considerations about Giorgi and Pianesi (1997), according to their proposition of IP extent in AGRs (AGR1 and AGR2) and TPs (TP1 and TP2). Considering Chomsky (1995), the authors state that verbs in the Present Tense are only interpreted in the LF, because this tense has a non-marked form, and, due to this fact, T1 is not lexicalized. With a present tense reading, only AGR1 and VP are projected. However, we could verify that the auxiliary in the Future Tense needs to be lexicalized, once it is the pivotal structure of the temporal notion that denotes Future Tense when added to the infinitive. Thus, the aim of this paper is to put Giorgi and Pianesi’s purpose in doubt and make considerations to expand on the analysis about the temporal syntax in Brazilian Portuguese. |
|---|