Assessment of a clinical score for screening suspected pulmonary tuberculosis cases

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy (sensitivity) of a clinical score for presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis cases during screening. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study comprising 1,365 patients attending the department of lung diseases at a secondary care outpatient clinic in the city of Rio d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Castro, Cristiano Bel Alves de, Costa, Paulo Albuquerque da, Ruffino-Netto, Antonio, Maciel, Ethel Leonor Noia, Kritski, Afranio Lineu
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2011
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Repositorio:Revista de Saúde Pública
Idioma:portugués
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usp.br:article/33058
Acceso en línea:https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/33058
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Tuberculose Pulmonar^i1^sdiagnóst
Diagnóstico Clínico
Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos
Triagem
Sensibilidade e Especificidade
Tuberculosis Pulmonar^i3^sdiagnos
Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos
Triaje
Sensibilidad y Especificidad
Tuberculosis^i2^sPulmon
Tuberculosis^i2^sdiagno
Clinical Diagnosis
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Triage
Sensitivity and Specificity
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy (sensitivity) of a clinical score for presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis cases during screening. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study comprising 1,365 patients attending the department of lung diseases at a secondary care outpatient clinic in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, during 2006 and 2007. All respondents answered a standardized questionnaire administered by the clinic's nursing staff. Information on age, weight and clinical symptoms were collected. The presumptive diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis was made by summing up the scores of the data collected. The diagnosis of active tuberculosis was based on bacteriological findings and medical criteria. There were estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a set prevalence, and 95% confidence intervals for different score cutoffs. The score performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of tuberculosis, cough for more than one week and cough for more than three weeks showed a sensitivity of 88.2% (86.2, 90.2) and 61.1% (57.93, 64.3), specificity 19.2% (16.6, 21.8) and 51.3% (48.1, 54.5), respectively. The clinical score of 8 had a sensitivity of 83.13% (77.8, 87.6), specificity of 51.8% (48.5, 55.1), positive predictive value of 91.6% (90.0, 83.2) and negative predictive value of 32.9% (30.1, 35.7). CONCLUSIONS: Cough for more than three weeks showed low sensitivity and specificity. A highly sensitive clinical score can be an alternative tool for screening pulmonary tuberculosis as it allows early care of suspected cases and standard nursing care approach.