Beyond deliberation? onsiderations about the normativity of the post-structuralist theory of radical democracy
The present article has the objective of presenting and discussing – in the sphere of post-structuralist theories of radical democracy, mainly those identified through the “Theory of speech of the Essex School” – the recent effort in order to reduce what the authors themselves admit to be a normativ...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
| Repositorio: | Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8234 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/8234 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Deliberative democracy Post-structuralism Theory of speech Normativity Democracia deliberativa Pós-Estruturalismo Teoria do discurso Normatividade |
| Sumario: | The present article has the objective of presenting and discussing – in the sphere of post-structuralist theories of radical democracy, mainly those identified through the “Theory of speech of the Essex School” – the recent effort in order to reduce what the authors themselves admit to be a normative deficit in relation to their contemporary discussions about democracy. More concretely, this work focuses on two political-normative models that have arisen from this theoretical tradition, especially the works of Chantal Mouffe and Aletta Norval. The aim is to point out the eventual advances obtained through post-structuralism, an alternative theoretical model to the deliberative focus on the contemporary democratic debate. |
|---|