Comportamento ou instituições? A evolução histórica do neo-institucionalismo da ciência política
The article aims to reconstruct historically the Political Science neo-institutionalism paradigm in order to explore two points. The first one consists in arguing that there were two factors that contributed to the neo-institutional revolution in politics, which are: the emergence of the economical...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2008 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/4590 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092008000300005 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4590 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Neo-Institutionalism Behaviorism History of Political Science Political Institutions Neo-Institucionalismo Comportamentalismo História da Ciência Política Instituições Políticas |
| Sumario: | The article aims to reconstruct historically the Political Science neo-institutionalism paradigm in order to explore two points. The first one consists in arguing that there were two factors that contributed to the neo-institutional revolution in politics, which are: the emergence of the economical analysis of political phenomena under the optics of the paradoxes of collective decisions, from the 1950s, and the crisis in behaviorism in the 1960s. The second one consists in arguing that the neo-institutional approach is a synthesis of part of the behaviorism with part of the old institutionalism. |
|---|