Indexing of clinical trials in LILACS: Assessment of 721 articles published in cardiology journals

Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence for decision making in health care issues. One of the first steps of a SR involves identifying all relevant clinical trials on the topic of interest. However, the retrieval of clinical trials in a database partially depends on the artic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: da Conceicao, Maria Analia [UNIFESP], Chiquetto da Silva, Maria Regina [UNIFESP], Tello, German Eduardo, Torloni, Maria Regina
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/57388
Acceso en línea:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892017000300008
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57388
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Indexing as topic
Bibliographic databases
Clinical trials as topic
Quality control
Periodicals as topic
Descripción
Sumario:Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence for decision making in health care issues. One of the first steps of a SR involves identifying all relevant clinical trials on the topic of interest. However, the retrieval of clinical trials in a database partially depends on the article indexing quality. The aim of this article is to evaluate the adequacy of indexing of clinical trials as a publication type in the LILACS database in a sample of articles published in cardiology journals. This cross-sectional study analyzed the indexing quality of clinical trials published between 2008 and 2009 in cardiology journals indexed in LILACS. Two independent reviewers identified and reclassified all original studies published in these journals as being clinical trials or other types of studies. The result of their classification was compared with the indexing publication type produced by LILACS. A total of 721 articles published in 11 cardiology journals were included. The reviewers classified 63 articles as clinical trials