A verdade enquanto movimento: entre possibilidades e limites segundo o pensamento heideggeriano
The dissertation has the aim to explore the truth as movement in the thought of the philosopher Martin Heidegger. The work it is divides in four parts. First of all, in the Introduction, we contextualize the research and present the questions that will be our guide in the course of the work. It is c...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | master thesis |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Institution: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
| Repository: | Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/20954 |
| Online Access: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20954 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Heidegger, Martin [1889-1976] - Crítica e interpretação Verdade Mistério Heidegger, Martin [1889-1976] - Criticism and interpretation Truth Mtstery CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
| Summary: | The dissertation has the aim to explore the truth as movement in the thought of the philosopher Martin Heidegger. The work it is divides in four parts. First of all, in the Introduction, we contextualize the research and present the questions that will be our guide in the course of the work. It is clarified that the relation between modern science and philosophy is our starting point for thinking the truth, but this isn’t our main focus. In the first chapter, Notions of Truth, we start clarifying the tradicional concept of truth and the tradition in which it is found, namely the metaphysical tradition; posteriorly, we analyze the concept of αλήθεια (alétheia), rescued by Heidegger to understand the essence of truth as unconcealment. In the second chapter, Being, Truth and Mystery, at first we see how the truth is inserted in the context of Being and Time, and then how the so-called turning (Kehre) alters the truth’s understanding, to undertake the task of analyze the truth as movement, taking into consideration the Clearing and the Mystery. The truth isn’t, but it is given, truth essentials itself, that is, truth is a movement that opens a space that allows the entities to be. Dasein essentially corresponds with this space that is open by the truth of Being, however, the truth itself ins’t predicated of human beings. If there is an opening there is also a limit: this is the relation between the Clearing and the Mystery. In a certain way, the truth doesn’t only illuminate (unconcealment), but it is limit as well (concealment). It is perceived that Heidegger’s gaze isn’t aimed to an logic understanding of the truth, but aimed to an ontological understanding of this phenomenon. Lastly, in the third and final chapter, Between possibilities and limits: final considerations, we return to what is at the beginning and trigger of the research subject: the relation between modern science and philosophy. The aim is to carry out some reflections and questionings about this relationship, thinking the possibilities and limits that both have. The truth is a fundamental question because it concerns, if we think in a heideggerian way, to what enables not only the entity but the knowledge itself. This understanding has consequences not only in philosophy, but also in “sciences” |
|---|