Open Peer Review: practices and definitions
Open Peer Review is addressed by several authors and its adoption as an aspect of the Open Science movement has been increasing. Thus, this study aims to investigate the main practices and definitions of Open Peer Review through a non-systematized Literature Review, having the selection of articles...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Múltiplos Olhares em Ciência da Informação |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/38993 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/moci/article/view/38993 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Revisão por pares Revisão por Pares Aberta Revisão Aberta entre Pares Open Peer Review OPR Peer Review |
| Sumario: | Open Peer Review is addressed by several authors and its adoption as an aspect of the Open Science movement has been increasing. Thus, this study aims to investigate the main practices and definitions of Open Peer Review through a non-systematized Literature Review, having the selection of articles to compose the study by the subjective analysis of the researchers. Peer Review is considered “open” when review reports and reviewer identities are made available. An open evaluation can also take place through social comments, referees' credentials and others. There is no single definition, and its practices and processes are not clearly established. It is configured as an “umbrella” since stakeholders adapt a definition according to interests or objectives. Regarding practices and processes, it was possible to conclude that they are still incipient and varied. |
|---|