Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks and Deep Learning Data Augmentation: A Multi-Perspective Data-Driven Survey Across Multiple Application Fields and Classification Architectures
Effectively training deep learning models relies heavily on large datasets, as insufficient instances can hinder model generalization. A simple yet effective way to address this is by applying modern deep learning augmentation methods, as they synthesize new data matching the input distribution whil...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/300324 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ai6020032 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300324 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | conditional generative adversarial networks data augmentation deep learning deep neural networks image processing |
| Sumario: | Effectively training deep learning models relies heavily on large datasets, as insufficient instances can hinder model generalization. A simple yet effective way to address this is by applying modern deep learning augmentation methods, as they synthesize new data matching the input distribution while preserving the semantic content. While these methods produce realistic samples, important issues persist concerning how well they generalize across different classification architectures and their overall impact in accuracy improvement. Furthermore, the relationship between dataset size and model accuracy, as well as the determination of an optimal augmentation level, remains an open question in the field. Aiming to address these challenges, in this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of eight data augmentation methods—StyleGAN3, DCGAN, SAGAN, RandAugment, Random Erasing, AutoAugment, TrivialAugment and AugMix—throughout several classification networks of varying depth: ResNet18, ConvNeXt-Nano, DenseNet121 and InceptionResNetV2. By comparing their performance on diverse datasets from leaf textures, medical imaging and remote sensing, we assess which methods offer superior accuracy and generalization capability in training models with no pre-trained weights. Our findings indicate that deep learning data augmentation is an effective tool for dealing with small datasets, achieving accuracy gains of up to 17%. |
|---|