The Human Sciences in the National Curricular Common Base: otherness from the perspective of Mikhail Bakhtin's philosophy of responsible act
This article establishes a relationship between the approach of the subject and its relations of alterity in the scope of Human Sciences in elementary and secondary education present in the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC) and the philosophy of responsible act of the Russian philosopher Mikhai...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
| Repositório: | Revista Educação (Santa Maria. Online) |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/72274 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reveducacao/article/view/72274 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Base Nacional Comum Curricular Alteridade Mikhail Bakhtin Common National Curriculum Base Otherness |
| Resumo: | This article establishes a relationship between the approach of the subject and its relations of alterity in the scope of Human Sciences in elementary and secondary education present in the National Common Curricular Base (BNCC) and the philosophy of responsible act of the Russian philosopher Mikhail Bakhtin (1895-1975), with the aim of debating and interpreting them from this perspective. Through a bibliographic and qualitative research, Bakhtin's work Towards a Philosophy of Responsible Act is used as the main reference. Initially, some questions are indicated in the text of the BNCC that can support and contextualize the debate. Then, some concepts of Bakhtin are presented, in order to establish a dialogue between the BNCC and the philosophy of responsible act, indicating in the document the passages that ratify the arguments used. As a result of the research, when viewing the issues related to otherness in the BNCC document from the perspective of the Russian philosopher, similarities and divergences in the conception of “subject” and “ethical action” are observed. Finally, and taking into account the continental dimensions of Brazil and the need for harmonious coexistence between groups that have different accents, customs and traditions, it is concluded that the debate proposed here is urgent and necessary. |
|---|