On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames
How have anthropologists related to extraordinary or supernatural phenomena (the transcendent) in disciplinary definitions of religion and in the practice of social analysis? This text argues that the discipline’s engagement with alterities that dispute our ontological secular conceptions makes evid...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2021 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| Repositório: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/232300 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/232300 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Religião Antropologia Secularity Immanence Transcendence Supernatural Media Epistemology |
| id |
BR_209589ebedce77d3ce4f08cd130dcfc5 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/232300 |
| network_acronym_str |
BR |
| network_name_str |
Brasil |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
2021-11-29T04:28:39Z20211096-1151http://hdl.handle.net/10183/232300001133471How have anthropologists related to extraordinary or supernatural phenomena (the transcendent) in disciplinary definitions of religion and in the practice of social analysis? This text argues that the discipline’s engagement with alterities that dispute our ontological secular conceptions makes evident its form of knowledge production. The central claim is that anthropology’s secularity is not fixed and should be discussed as part of a historical process. I propose to analyse two modalities of secularity, which I term ‘extinction’ and ‘captivity’. A second claim is that despite their differences, both modalities (re)produce to its academic and Euro-American audience anthropology’s own secularity as a natural human condition. A third claim is that by recognising the characteristics of our discipline’s secularity we may start to speak of a plurality of secular ontologies as a way to register the multiplicity of ‘worldliness’ that traditions and individuals may assume or call for.application/pdfengReligion. [London, England]. Vol. 51, n. 4 (2021), p. [533]-550ReligiãoAntropologiaSecularityImmanenceTranscendenceSupernaturalMediaEpistemologyOn two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent framesEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSDullo, EduardoTEXT001133471.pdf.txt001133471.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain67516http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/232300/2/001133471.pdf.txt8d0cf19f5d5ec28e80540f3a863bf5c1MD52ORIGINAL001133471.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1660604http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/232300/1/001133471.pdf2d3e687465f0910013a800443328f62bMD5110183/2323002021-12-06 05:35:32.937195oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/232300Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2021-12-06T07:35:32Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
| dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames |
| title |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames |
| spellingShingle |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames Dullo, Eduardo Religião Antropologia Secularity Immanence Transcendence Supernatural Media Epistemology |
| title_short |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames |
| title_full |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames |
| title_fullStr |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames |
| title_full_unstemmed |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames |
| title_sort |
On two modalities of our secularity : anthropology's immanent frames |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Dullo, Eduardo |
| author |
Dullo, Eduardo |
| author_facet |
Dullo, Eduardo |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Religião Antropologia |
| topic |
Religião Antropologia Secularity Immanence Transcendence Supernatural Media Epistemology |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Secularity Immanence Transcendence Supernatural Media Epistemology |
| description |
How have anthropologists related to extraordinary or supernatural phenomena (the transcendent) in disciplinary definitions of religion and in the practice of social analysis? This text argues that the discipline’s engagement with alterities that dispute our ontological secular conceptions makes evident its form of knowledge production. The central claim is that anthropology’s secularity is not fixed and should be discussed as part of a historical process. I propose to analyse two modalities of secularity, which I term ‘extinction’ and ‘captivity’. A second claim is that despite their differences, both modalities (re)produce to its academic and Euro-American audience anthropology’s own secularity as a natural human condition. A third claim is that by recognising the characteristics of our discipline’s secularity we may start to speak of a plurality of secular ontologies as a way to register the multiplicity of ‘worldliness’ that traditions and individuals may assume or call for. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-29T04:28:39Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/232300 |
| dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1096-1151 |
| dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001133471 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1096-1151 001133471 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/232300 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Religion. [London, England]. Vol. 51, n. 4 (2021), p. [533]-550 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| instacron_str |
UFRGS |
| institution |
UFRGS |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/232300/2/001133471.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/232300/1/001133471.pdf |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8d0cf19f5d5ec28e80540f3a863bf5c1 2d3e687465f0910013a800443328f62b |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
| _version_ |
1853675885130940416 |
| score |
15,198674 |