Prevalência de acidentes com material biológico em um município do noroeste de São Paulo, Brasil, no período de 2007 a 2011

The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of reports of accidents involving biological material which affected health professionals, especially dental health ones, in a city in the north­western region of São Paulo State, Brazil. Data collection was con­ducted through the notificati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martins, Ronald Jefferson [UNESP], Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba [UNESP], Garbin, Artênio José Isper [UNESP], Gonçalves, Patrick Raphael Vicente [UNESP], Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba [UNESP]
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2014
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/133900
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-24492014000200006&script=sci_arttext
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/133900
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Exposure to biological agents
Occupational accidents registry
Accidents
Occupational
Health manpower
Exposicáo a agentes biológicos
Notificacáo de acidentes de trabalho
Acidentes de trabalho
Recursos humanos em saúde
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of reports of accidents involving biological material which affected health professionals, especially dental health ones, in a city in the north­western region of São Paulo State, Brazil. Data collection was con­ducted through the notification of accidents with biological material from 2007 to 2011. There were 377 notifications, in which 353 (93.6%) had female professionals involved. The most reported type of exposure was the percutaneous in 359 cases (95.2%) followed by blood in 334 cases (88.6%) which is the most mentioned biological material in the reports. Only 21 (5.6%) notifications were from den­tal staff and occurred mostly with the dentist, 14 times (66.7%) and 16 times (76.2%) during clinical procedures. The prevalence of bio­logical accidents among dental teams was little in this time, which suggests the possibility of underreporting, in addition to being sub­ject to the partial fulfillment of the same.