Modernismo, pós-modernismo e análise organizacional: uma introdução
The paper introduces the current debate in the human sciences between the opposing conceptual positions of "'modernism" and "postmodernism" and discusses its implications for organizational analysis. The debate focusses on the nature of "discourse"' (informati...
| Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2006 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Institution: | Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| Repository: | Revista de Administração de Empresas |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/37086 |
| Online Access: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/37086 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Modernism postmodernism discourse social systems organization studies Modernismo pós-modernismo discurso sistemas sociais estudos organizacionais |
| Summary: | The paper introduces the current debate in the human sciences between the opposing conceptual positions of "'modernism" and "postmodernism" and discusses its implications for organizational analysis. The debate focusses on the nature of "discourse"' (information, knowledge, communication) and its role in social systems. The discourse of modernism rests on transcendent yet anthropocentric criteria such as 'progress' and 'reason' which are varyingly exemplified in the work of Bell, Luhmann and Habermas. In contrast, postmodern discourse (represented here mainly by the work of Lyotard, Derrida. Foucault, Deleuze and Guattari) analyzes social life in terms of paradox and indeterminacy, thus rejecting the human agent as the centre of rational control and understanding. The paper then considers two contrasting views of the organizing process which follow from these opposing approaches to discourse. In the modernist model organization is viewed as a social tool and an extension of human rationality. In the postmodern view, organization is less the expression of planned thought and calculative action and a more defensive reaction to forces intrinsic to the social body which constantly threaten the stability of organized life. The implications of the latter view for orthodox organizational analysis are discussed in some detail. |
|---|