Comparação da leitura de escolares com gagueira em duas condições de escuta: habitual e atrasada
ABSTRACTPurpose: to compare the immediate effects of delayed auditory feedback in oral reading task of school-age children with persistent developmental stuttering.Methods: this study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (n° 0714/2013). Participated 16 school-children aged 8-17 years,...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157758 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201618114015 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157758 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences Speech Disorders Reading Stuttering Feedback Fonoaudiologia Distúrbios da Fala Leitura Gagueira Retroalimentação |
| Resumo: | ABSTRACTPurpose: to compare the immediate effects of delayed auditory feedback in oral reading task of school-age children with persistent developmental stuttering.Methods: this study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (n° 0714/2013). Participated 16 school-children aged 8-17 years, 11 males and 5 females, divided into two experimental groups (EG1 and EG2) with 8 participants each; EG1 composed by participants with moderate stuttering and EG2 with severe or very severe stuttering. The procedures employed were: audiologic evaluation, fluency assessment in spontaneous speech and evaluation of oral reading fluency, in two listening situations: with Nonaltered Auditory Feedback - NAF and Delayed - DAF. The Fono Tools software along with Andrea PureAudio USB -AS adapter and headset microphone Karsect HT- 2 were employed to cause the effect of the DAF and to record speech.Results: the effect of the delayed auditory feedback led to reduction of stuttering-like disfluencies in both groups, but the frequency of other disfluencies increased in the moderate stuttering group and decreased in the group with severe / very severe stuttering and thus, total disfluencies showed a more significant decrease in EG2. There were statistically significant differences for oral reading only in intergroup comparison for stuttering-like disfluencies, at nonaltered auditory feedback situation.Conclusions: the delayed auditory feedback did not cause significant effects during oral reading in both groups, however the effect may tend to be considered as positive for the group with severe / very severe stuttering. |
|---|