The historia magistra vitae and Postmodernism
This paper proposes a critique of some current views in Theory of History, mainly by Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen, but also by the Post-Moderns, who identify a radical break betweenhistoriographical models of classical antiquity and modernity. Starting from the preliminary analysis of Arnaldo M...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2013 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
| Repositório: | História da Historiografia |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/618 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/618 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Historia magistra vitae Pós-modernismo Historiografia antiga |
| Resumo: | This paper proposes a critique of some current views in Theory of History, mainly by Reinhart Koselleck and Jörn Rüsen, but also by the Post-Moderns, who identify a radical break betweenhistoriographical models of classical antiquity and modernity. Starting from the preliminary analysis of Arnaldo Momigliano on the issue, I propose to identify the different approaches ofthese modern authors as part of a Zeitgeist that has discarded some ancient assumptions of the relationship between history, truth, utility and example, offering a reframe of such relationships for our contemporary times. |
|---|