SIMULAÇÃO DA DISTRIBUIÇÃO ESPACIAL DA ÁGUA EM IRRIGAÇÃO LOCALIZADA SUBSUPERFICIAL
The objective of this work was to study the dynamics of water movement in soils under subsurface drip irrigation, using numeric simulation procedures with the development of a interactive computational model. The main objective was to estimate, using soil-water retention parameters (initial soil-wat...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 1998 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211613 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v02n02p158-164 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211613 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | water simulation subsurface drip irrigation água simulação irrigação localizada subsuperficial |
| Sumario: | The objective of this work was to study the dynamics of water movement in soils under subsurface drip irrigation, using numeric simulation procedures with the development of a interactive computational model. The main objective was to estimate, using soil-water retention parameters (initial soil-water content, soil-water retention curve and saturated hydraulic conductivity) and emitter parameters (emitter flow), the spatial distribution of moisture in soil after a time increment. To calibrate the model, tests were made under field conditions in a Ultisol intergrade to typic Oxisol (texturel medium/clay). Four tests were performed under a flow of 5.6t.h-1 and 3.3t.h-1 to a single emitter, and a flow of 4.3t.h-1 and 2.2t.h-1 when two emitters worked simultaneously. Simulated and observed data showed good agreement when the Student's t-Test for mean comparision was used. Also performed was a simulation error analysis (spatial deviation coefficient), expressed as a relation between the simulated and observed soil-water content. Results showed that deviations ranged from -14% to +18%. |
|---|