Application of an active middle ear implant in congenital middle ear malformations : a contemporary review

Objective: To evaluate hearing outcomes and postoperative complications among patients with middle and external ear malformations undergoing active middle ear implantation with Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB). Methods: Review of the literature. Studies published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish at the...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Silva, Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da, Pauna, Henrique Furlan, Guimarães, Guilherme Corrêa, Lavinsky, Joel, Linder, Thomas E., Castilho, Arthur Menino
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/287679
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10183/287679
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Prótese ossicular
Anormalidades congênitas
Orelha média
Perda auditiva
Hearing loss
External ear malformation
Ear surgery
Hearing aids
Middle ear implants
Descrição
Resumo:Objective: To evaluate hearing outcomes and postoperative complications among patients with middle and external ear malformations undergoing active middle ear implantation with Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB). Methods: Review of the literature. Studies published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish at the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. The search strategy yielded a total of 141 potentially relevant studies. Of these, ten were included in this analysis. Results: The mean preoperative air conduction threshold was 66.7 ± 6.2 dB. The mean air-bone gap was 46 ± 7.7 dB. VSB implantation resulted in mean hearing gain of 40.5 ± 7.1 dB in the air-conduction thresholds among the evaluated frequencies. The speech recognition index if the Floating Mass Transducer (FMT) was placed in the short process was 86.0% ± 9.6%, with significant difference when compared to long process coupling (p = 0.035) and the round window coupling (p =  0.048). Conclusion: Bone conduction thresholds did not worsen in any of the studies included in the present review. VSB implantation resulted in a mean hearing gain of 40 dB at air conduction thresholds.