Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos e a possibilidade de reconhecimento da margem de apreciação nacional quanto às garantias judiciais em processos de impeachment
The performance of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (I/A Court H.R.), as much in a contentious as in an advisory way, starts to establish milestones in human rights multilevel protection, signing interpretations concerning the Convention of the Rights of Man, by means of Advisory Opinions re...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
| Repositorio: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/73973 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/73973 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Advisory opinion. Judicial guarantees. Impeachment. Margin of national appreciation. Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Opinião consultiva. Garantias judiciais. Impeachment. Margem de apreciação nacional. |
| Sumario: | The performance of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (I/A Court H.R.), as much in a contentious as in an advisory way, starts to establish milestones in human rights multilevel protection, signing interpretations concerning the Convention of the Rights of Man, by means of Advisory Opinions requested by the States or even by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) itself, being also the object of analysis for the San Jose Courthouse the recognition of a national margin of appreciation. In this context, using the deductive research approach, through the analysis of a solicitation of advisory opinion about the legal guarantees in political judgments, it is asked: — Does the Inter-American Court recognize a national margin of appreciation regarding the legal guarantees in impeachment processes? For this purpose, in the first moment, the advisory and contentious functions of this body of the Inter-American Protection System is addressed, in order to, then, analyze the resolution concerning the cited advisory opinion. It is possible to conclude the recognition, by the Courthouse, of a national margin of appreciation regarding the legal guarantees and the control of impeachment processes, guaranteeing the States a space of discretion while handling this topic. |
|---|