Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis
Aim: The aim of this study was to verify the color variation between different composite resins and the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Methods: Two-millimeter thickness samples were made (n = 6) from eight commercial brands of composite resin (shade A2): Charisma (Kulzer), Forma (Ultradent), Harmonize...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
| Repositorio: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670869 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Composite resin Color Spectrophotometry |
| id |
BR_0987a2b9f103fbd02e6a435b2f09dcbc |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670869 |
| network_acronym_str |
BR |
| network_name_str |
Brasil |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysisComposite resinColorSpectrophotometryAim: The aim of this study was to verify the color variation between different composite resins and the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Methods: Two-millimeter thickness samples were made (n = 6) from eight commercial brands of composite resin (shade A2): Charisma (Kulzer), Forma (Ultradent), Harmonize (Kerr), Luna (SDI), Opallis (FGM), Oppus Bulk Fill (FGM), Vittra (FGM) and Filtek Z250 XT (3M ESPE). Specimens were stored in distilled water for 7 days and then polished. Color measurements of samples and A2 shade of the Vita Classical Shade Guide were performed using the Vita Easy Shade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer on a black background. Color variations were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula, considering values ≥0.81 being noticeable by the human eye and ≥1.77 being clinically unacceptable. Results were statistically analyzed with a 5% significance level. Results: Color variation (ΔE) of composite (E1 ) compared to the Vita Classical Shade Guide (E0 ) was greater than clinically acceptable for all the materials evaluated in this study. Forma (ΔE=2.08 ± sd=0.47) and Filtek Z250 XT (2.50 ± 0.20) had the smallest amount of color variation values found in the results. Harmonize (3.32 ± 0.63) presented values similar to Filtek Z250 XT, but it was worse than Forma. Vittra (3.51 ± 0.28), Charisma (3.80 ± 0.20), Opallis (4.24 ± 0.30) and Luna (5.67 ± 0.20) did not differ among each other and presented higher color variation than Forma, Filtek Z350XT and Harmonize. Oppus Bulk Fill (13.94 ± 1.12) was the composite with the greatest color variation. Conclusions: The findings in this study show that attention should be taken when using the Vita Color Shade Guide for composite shade selection.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2024-03-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/867086910.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670869Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240869Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e2408691677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869/33657Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2024 João Vitor Andrade Denadai, Roberto Zimmer, Eduardo Galia Reston, Guilherme Anziliero Arossihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDenadai, João Vitor AndradeZimmer, RobertoReston, Eduardo GaliaArossi, Guilherme Anziliero2024-11-29T15:19:00Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670869Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2024-11-29T15:19Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
| title |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
| spellingShingle |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis Denadai, João Vitor Andrade Composite resin Color Spectrophotometry |
| title_short |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
| title_full |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
| title_fullStr |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
| title_sort |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Denadai, João Vitor Andrade Zimmer, Roberto Reston, Eduardo Galia Arossi, Guilherme Anziliero |
| author |
Denadai, João Vitor Andrade |
| author_facet |
Denadai, João Vitor Andrade Zimmer, Roberto Reston, Eduardo Galia Arossi, Guilherme Anziliero |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Zimmer, Roberto Reston, Eduardo Galia Arossi, Guilherme Anziliero |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Composite resin Color Spectrophotometry |
| topic |
Composite resin Color Spectrophotometry |
| description |
Aim: The aim of this study was to verify the color variation between different composite resins and the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Methods: Two-millimeter thickness samples were made (n = 6) from eight commercial brands of composite resin (shade A2): Charisma (Kulzer), Forma (Ultradent), Harmonize (Kerr), Luna (SDI), Opallis (FGM), Oppus Bulk Fill (FGM), Vittra (FGM) and Filtek Z250 XT (3M ESPE). Specimens were stored in distilled water for 7 days and then polished. Color measurements of samples and A2 shade of the Vita Classical Shade Guide were performed using the Vita Easy Shade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer on a black background. Color variations were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula, considering values ≥0.81 being noticeable by the human eye and ≥1.77 being clinically unacceptable. Results were statistically analyzed with a 5% significance level. Results: Color variation (ΔE) of composite (E1 ) compared to the Vita Classical Shade Guide (E0 ) was greater than clinically acceptable for all the materials evaluated in this study. Forma (ΔE=2.08 ± sd=0.47) and Filtek Z250 XT (2.50 ± 0.20) had the smallest amount of color variation values found in the results. Harmonize (3.32 ± 0.63) presented values similar to Filtek Z250 XT, but it was worse than Forma. Vittra (3.51 ± 0.28), Charisma (3.80 ± 0.20), Opallis (4.24 ± 0.30) and Luna (5.67 ± 0.20) did not differ among each other and presented higher color variation than Forma, Filtek Z350XT and Harmonize. Oppus Bulk Fill (13.94 ± 1.12) was the composite with the greatest color variation. Conclusions: The findings in this study show that attention should be taken when using the Vita Color Shade Guide for composite shade selection. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-10 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869 10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670869 |
| url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670869 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869/33657 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporany |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240869 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240869 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
| instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
| institution |
UNICAMP |
| reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
| collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
| _version_ |
1853674714985136128 |
| score |
15.301603 |