Effects of sensorimotor training on pelvic stability and balance in runners

Introduction: Running has increased significantly in recent years due to its benefits and practicality. However, like any sport, running poses a risk of injury, leading to the need for clinical intervention and even its practitioners quitting the sport. Therefore, preventive strategies seeking to mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: de Freitas, Letícia Jonas, Ignácio, Sharon Moreira, Bonfim, Thatia Regina
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2021
Country:Brasil
Institution:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
Repository:Fisioterapia em Movimento
Language:English
Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/28641
Online Access:https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28641
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Injuries in athletes. Prevention. Proprioception. Running.
Lesões em atletas. Prevenção. Proprio-cepção. Corrida.
Description
Summary:Introduction: Running has increased significantly in recent years due to its benefits and practicality. However, like any sport, running poses a risk of injury, leading to the need for clinical intervention and even its practitioners quitting the sport. Therefore, preventive strategies seeking to minimize the occurrence and consequences of such risk factors in these athletes are pivotal. Objective: To investigate the preventive effects of a sensorimotor training protocol on the balance and pelvic stability of runners. Methods: The study sample consisted of fourteen 10-km runners of both genders divided into two groups: the control group (CG) and the sensorimotor training group (SMTG). Both groups were evaluated using the single-leg stance test (static balance), Trendelenburg test (pelvic stability), and hop test (dynamic balance). The SMTG underwent 16 interventions, while the CG did not receive any intervention. Results: The SMTG showed a significant increase in the permanence time of the single-leg stance test (p0.05). Regarding pelvic stability, there was no significant difference in any of the groups. Conclusion: The proposed protocol significantly improved the static balance of the SMTG, but not the pelvic stability.