“Is there a tradition in Negro art? Can a European appreciate Negro art?”: Wittgenstein on aesthetics and prejudices
In Lectures on Aesthetics (1938), comprised of notes taken by his students and later published as part of the work Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, Wittgenstein makes considerations about the aesthetic experience from the clarification of a concept in partic...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
| Repositório: | Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/55731 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/55731 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | aesthetic appreciation; rules; context; cultural diversity. apreciação estética; regras; contexto; diversidade cultural. |
| Resumo: | In Lectures on Aesthetics (1938), comprised of notes taken by his students and later published as part of the work Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, Wittgenstein makes considerations about the aesthetic experience from the clarification of a concept in particular, the appreciation, which is fundamental for the understanding of this specific domain of the language he intends to investigate - the aesthetic language. It is in this context that two questions emerge made by his student Rush Rhees, particularly referring to Negro art, that reveal opportune occasion to add, in the aesthetic discussion, the problem of prejudice that can exist in the way in which the subject appreciates the artistic production of cultures different from his own. Thus, as a result of the reflection on the concept of aesthetic appreciation, which implies the need to take account the rules of the context of the work of art in order to make a more accurate aesthetic judgment, Wittgenstein responds to Rhees by raising a series of elements that allow to reflect on the issue of prejudices that are felt including in the field of aesthetics. With this, from the Wittgensteinian thought, the possibility of sketching an answer to a theme still latent in society is identified, as it proposes to dispel prejudices and overcome the narrowness of spirit that is behind misrepresented conceptions about others cultures, with the aim of allowing, in turn, to contemplate the differences in perspectives and the wealth they represent, in favor of the exercise of respect and tolerance with regard to cultural diversity. |
|---|