Comment on“Surface thermodynamics reconsidered. Derivationof the Gokhshtein relations from the Gibbs potential; and a newapproach to surface stress”by Stephen Fletcher
The present article comments on the article of Stephen Fletcher (Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1231–1238). The analysis deals with the validity of equation (31 or 40) of the latter for an ideally polarisable interface.
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/31363 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/31363 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Comment Polarisable Interface Stephen Fletcher https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| Sumario: | The present article comments on the article of Stephen Fletcher (Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1231–1238). The analysis deals with the validity of equation (31 or 40) of the latter for an ideally polarisable interface. |
|---|