Lagrangian versus Eulerian integration errors

The possibility to use a Lagrangian frame to solve problems with large time-steps was successfully explored previously by the authors for the solution of homogeneous incompressible fluids and also for solving multi-fluid problems (Idelsohn etal. 2012; 2014; 2013). The strategy used by the authors wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Idelsohn, Sergio Rodolfo, Oñate, Eugenio, Nigro, Norberto Marcelo, Becker, Pablo Javier, Gimenez, Juan Marcelo
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2015
País:Argentina
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositorio:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/38235
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/38235
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations
Lagrange Formulations
Multi-Fluids Flows
Numerical Integration Errors
Particle Methods
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
Descripción
Sumario:The possibility to use a Lagrangian frame to solve problems with large time-steps was successfully explored previously by the authors for the solution of homogeneous incompressible fluids and also for solving multi-fluid problems (Idelsohn etal. 2012; 2014; 2013). The strategy used by the authors was named Particle Finite Element Method second generation (PFEM-2).The objective of this paper is to demonstrate in which circumstances the use of a Lagrangian frame with particles is more accurate than a classical Eulerian finite element method, and when large time-steps and/or coarse meshes may be used.