The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method

Numerous sampling methods have been applied to study intertidal rock pool fishes. There is limited information comparing the performance and suitability of such methods, which complicates comparisons between studies. We compared the performance of the bailing and visual census methods in 10 rock poo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: González Murcia, Saúl, Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción, Guerra, Jeniffer, Logan, Murray
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Argentina
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositorio:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/233395
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/233395
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:BIAS
ETHOLOGY
FISH
HABITAT COMPLEXITY
SAMPLING METHODS
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
id AR_e9e9b2bcda76de93f423abd3077e1a5f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/233395
network_acronym_str AR
network_name_str Argentina
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
El bueno y el mejor, muestreando peces de pozas intermareales tropicales: una comparación entre el censo visual vs. el método de vaciado
title The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
spellingShingle The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
González Murcia, Saúl
BIAS
ETHOLOGY
FISH
HABITAT COMPLEXITY
SAMPLING METHODS
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
title_short The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
title_full The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
title_fullStr The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
title_full_unstemmed The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
title_sort The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv González Murcia, Saúl
Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción
Guerra, Jeniffer
Logan, Murray
author González Murcia, Saúl
author_facet González Murcia, Saúl
Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción
Guerra, Jeniffer
Logan, Murray
author_role author
author2 Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción
Guerra, Jeniffer
Logan, Murray
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BIAS
ETHOLOGY
FISH
HABITAT COMPLEXITY
SAMPLING METHODS
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
topic BIAS
ETHOLOGY
FISH
HABITAT COMPLEXITY
SAMPLING METHODS
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
description Numerous sampling methods have been applied to study intertidal rock pool fishes. There is limited information comparing the performance and suitability of such methods, which complicates comparisons between studies. We compared the performance of the bailing and visual census methods in 10 rock pools to quantify abundance, species richness, and structure of fish assemblages in rock pool intertidal systems considering fish residency affinities, rock pool volume, and substratum rugosity. Sampling was conducted 13 times across the com-plete set of 10 rock pools from June to December, 2018. Each of the pools was sampled with a visual census and then the bailing method. A sampling event was defined as the process of conducting both a visual and a bailing survey in a single rock pool. In total, 1,749 individuals of 14 species were detected using the bailing method, whereas 438 individuals of 8 species were recorded via visual census. The bailing method yielded higher abundance and species richness of resident, opportunist, and transient fish than the visual census. The detection of individuals and species showed a positive association with rock pool volume and negative association with substratum rugosity for both methods. In 32 sampling events, the bailing method detected fish correcting reports of fish absence (false negatives) recorded with the visual census. For the bailing method, resident fishes dominated the fish assemblage, whereas, for the visual census, resident and opportunist fishes contributed sim-ilarly to the community.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/233395
González Murcia, Saúl; Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción; Guerra, Jeniffer; Logan, Murray; The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas; Ciencias Marinas; 49; 12-2023; 1-33
0185-3880
2395-9053
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/233395
identifier_str_mv González Murcia, Saúl; Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción; Guerra, Jeniffer; Logan, Murray; The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas; Ciencias Marinas; 49; 12-2023; 1-33
0185-3880
2395-9053
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/3404
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.7773/cm.y2023.3404
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1799195402830872576
spelling The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing methodEl bueno y el mejor, muestreando peces de pozas intermareales tropicales: una comparación entre el censo visual vs. el método de vaciadoGonzález Murcia, SaúlAlvarado Larios, Raquel ConcepciónGuerra, JenifferLogan, MurrayBIASETHOLOGYFISHHABITAT COMPLEXITYSAMPLING METHODShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Numerous sampling methods have been applied to study intertidal rock pool fishes. There is limited information comparing the performance and suitability of such methods, which complicates comparisons between studies. We compared the performance of the bailing and visual census methods in 10 rock pools to quantify abundance, species richness, and structure of fish assemblages in rock pool intertidal systems considering fish residency affinities, rock pool volume, and substratum rugosity. Sampling was conducted 13 times across the com-plete set of 10 rock pools from June to December, 2018. Each of the pools was sampled with a visual census and then the bailing method. A sampling event was defined as the process of conducting both a visual and a bailing survey in a single rock pool. In total, 1,749 individuals of 14 species were detected using the bailing method, whereas 438 individuals of 8 species were recorded via visual census. The bailing method yielded higher abundance and species richness of resident, opportunist, and transient fish than the visual census. The detection of individuals and species showed a positive association with rock pool volume and negative association with substratum rugosity for both methods. In 32 sampling events, the bailing method detected fish correcting reports of fish absence (false negatives) recorded with the visual census. For the bailing method, resident fishes dominated the fish assemblage, whereas, for the visual census, resident and opportunist fishes contributed sim-ilarly to the community.Se han aplicado numerosos métodos de muestreo para estudiar los peces en pozas de marea. La información generada para contrastar el desempeño y la idoneidad de estos métodos es limitada, lo cual dificulta la comparación entre estudios. Comparamos el desempeño del método de vaciado y censo visual en 10 pozas de marea para cuantificar la abundancia, riqueza de especies y la estructura de los ensamblajes de peces en sistemas de pozas intermareales considerando las categorías de residencia de los peces, el volumen de las pozas y la rugosidad del sustrato. El muestreo se realizó en 13 ocasiones para el conjunto completo de 10 pozas entre junio y diciembre de 2018. Cada poza fue muestreada utilizando primero el censo visual y luego el vaciado de la misma. Un evento de muestreo fue definido como el proceso de llevar a cabo ambos métodos de muestreo, visual y vaciado de la poza, en una poza. En total, 1,749 individuos de 14 especies fueron detectados con el método de vaciado, mientras que 438 individuos de 8 especies fueron detectados con los censos visuales. El método de vaciado detectó mayores abundancias y riqueza de especies de peces residentes, oportunistas y transitorios en comparación con los censos visuales. La detección de individuos y especies se asoció positivamente con el volumen de las pozas y negativamente con la rugosidad del sustrato para ambos métodos. En 32 eventos de muestreo, el método de vaciado detectó peces donde los censos visuales registraron ausencia de peces (falsos negativos) lo que permitió corregir los registros. Para el método de vaciado, los peces residentes dominaron la comunidad de peces, mientras que, para el método de muestreo del censo visual, los peces residentes y oportunistas contribuyeron de manera similar a la comunidad.Fil: González Murcia, Saúl. UDP Ciencias Neotropicales; El Salvador. Fundación Naturaleza El Salvador; El Salvador. La Trobe University; AustraliaFil: Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Museo de Historia Natural; El SalvadorFil: Guerra, Jeniffer. Museo de Historia Natural; El SalvadorFil: Logan, Murray. Australian Institute Of Marine Science; AustraliaUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California. Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas2023-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/233395González Murcia, Saúl; Alvarado Larios, Raquel Concepción; Guerra, Jeniffer; Logan, Murray; The good and the better, sampling tropical intertidal rock pool fishes: a comparison between visual census vs. rock pool bailing method; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas; Ciencias Marinas; 49; 12-2023; 1-330185-38802395-9053CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/3404info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.7773/cm.y2023.3404info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T13:51:26Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/233395instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 13:51:26.932CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia