Biodiversity targets after 2010
The bold commitment made by the world´s govermments to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 will soon be tested. On the basis of the continuing declines measured by most indicators, it now seems inevitable that the aoutcome will be that it has not been achieved. Here, in order to build on th...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14517 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/14517 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Biodiversity Conservation Priorities https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| Sumario: | The bold commitment made by the world´s govermments to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 will soon be tested. On the basis of the continuing declines measured by most indicators, it now seems inevitable that the aoutcome will be that it has not been achieved. Here, in order to build on the momentum created by the 2010 target, we propose a shift away from a large set of static targets towards a smaller number of specific targets. Specifically, we present three categories of targets (red, green and blue) with examples of each. These relte respectively to (1) tose biodiversity outcomes that must be avoided to avert situations that are deleterious for people, (2) the highly valued biodiversity conservation priorities, and (3) an improved scientific understanding necessary for adaptive management now and into the future. |
|---|