Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment
We examine the hypothesis that driven by a competition heuristic, people don't even reflect or consider whether a cooperation strategy may be better. As a paradigmatic example of this behavior we propose the zero-sum game fallacy, according to which people believe that resources are fixed even...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42387 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42387 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | NUDGING COOPERATION https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
| id |
AR_e4efbbd6cdb2cb8cd2cc97d426464e0b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42387 |
| network_acronym_str |
AR |
| network_name_str |
Argentina |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd ExperimentNiella, TamaraStier, NicolasSigman, MarianoNUDGING COOPERATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5We examine the hypothesis that driven by a competition heuristic, people don't even reflect or consider whether a cooperation strategy may be better. As a paradigmatic example of this behavior we propose the zero-sum game fallacy, according to which people believe that resources are fixed even when they are not. We demonstrate that people only cooperate if the competitive heuristic is explicitly overridden in an experiment in which participants play two rounds of a game in which competition is suboptimal. The observed spontaneous behavior for most players was to compete. Then participants were explicitly reminded that the competing strategy may not be optimal. This minor intervention boosted cooperation, implying that competition does not result from lack of trust or willingness to cooperate but instead from the inability to inhibit the competition bias. This activity was performed in a controlled laboratory setting and also as a crowd experiment. Understanding the psychological underpinnings of these behaviors may help us improve cooperation and thus may have vast practical consequences to our society.Fil: Niella, Tamara. Universidad Torcuato di Tella; ArgentinaFil: Stier, Nicolas. Universidad Torcuato di Tella; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Sigman, Mariano. Universidad Torcuato di Tella; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaPublic Library of Science2016-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/zipapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/42387Niella, Tamara; Stier, Nicolas; Sigman, Mariano; Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 1; 1-2016; 1-20; e01471251932-6203CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0147125info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147125info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T13:38:02Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42387instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 13:38:02.55CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment |
| title |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment |
| spellingShingle |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment Niella, Tamara NUDGING COOPERATION https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
| title_short |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment |
| title_full |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment |
| title_fullStr |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment |
| title_sort |
Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Niella, Tamara Stier, Nicolas Sigman, Mariano |
| author |
Niella, Tamara |
| author_facet |
Niella, Tamara Stier, Nicolas Sigman, Mariano |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Stier, Nicolas Sigman, Mariano |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
NUDGING COOPERATION https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
| topic |
NUDGING COOPERATION https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
| description |
We examine the hypothesis that driven by a competition heuristic, people don't even reflect or consider whether a cooperation strategy may be better. As a paradigmatic example of this behavior we propose the zero-sum game fallacy, according to which people believe that resources are fixed even when they are not. We demonstrate that people only cooperate if the competitive heuristic is explicitly overridden in an experiment in which participants play two rounds of a game in which competition is suboptimal. The observed spontaneous behavior for most players was to compete. Then participants were explicitly reminded that the competing strategy may not be optimal. This minor intervention boosted cooperation, implying that competition does not result from lack of trust or willingness to cooperate but instead from the inability to inhibit the competition bias. This activity was performed in a controlled laboratory setting and also as a crowd experiment. Understanding the psychological underpinnings of these behaviors may help us improve cooperation and thus may have vast practical consequences to our society. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42387 Niella, Tamara; Stier, Nicolas; Sigman, Mariano; Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 1; 1-2016; 1-20; e0147125 1932-6203 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42387 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Niella, Tamara; Stier, Nicolas; Sigman, Mariano; Nudging Cooperation in a Crowd Experiment; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 11; 1; 1-2016; 1-20; e0147125 1932-6203 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0147125 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147125 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/zip application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library of Science |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library of Science |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1799194859338203136 |
| score |
15.812429 |