Characterization of nanocellulose- reinforced shape memory polyurethanes

Background: Shape memory polymers are capable of fixing a transient shape and of recovering their original dimensions by the application of an external stimulus. Their major drawback is their low stiffness compared to smart materials based on metals and ceramics. To overcome this disadvantage, nanoc...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Auad, María L., Contos, Vasili S., Nutt, Steve R., Aranguren, Mirta Ines, Marcovich, Norma Esther
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2008
País:Argentina
Recursos:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositório:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67760
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67760
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Cellulose Crystals
Nanocomposites
Shape Memory Polyurethanes
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.5
Descrição
Resumo:Background: Shape memory polymers are capable of fixing a transient shape and of recovering their original dimensions by the application of an external stimulus. Their major drawback is their low stiffness compared to smart materials based on metals and ceramics. To overcome this disadvantage, nanocellulose was utilized as reinforcement. Results: Composites were prepared by casting stable nanocellulose/ segmented polyurethane suspensions. The heat of melting of the polyurethane soft segment phase increased on cellulose addition. Composites showed higher tensile modulus and strength than unfilled films (53% modulus increase at 1 wt% nanocellulose), with higher elongation at break. Creep deformation decreased as cellulose concentration increased (36% decrease in 60-minute creep by addition of 1 wt% nanocellulose). The nanocomposites displayed shape memory properties equivalent to those of the neat polyurethane, with recoveries of the order of 95% (referred to second and further cycles). Conclusions: It is possible to markedly improve the rigidity of shape memory polymers by adding small amounts of well-dispersed nanocellulose. However, this improvement did not have substantial effects on the material shape fixity or recovery. Shape memory behavior seems to continue to be controlled by the polymer properties.