Dietary overlap of coexisting exotic brown hare (Lepus europaeus) and endemic mara (Dolichotis patagonum) in Northern Patagonia (Mendoza, Argentina)
Introduced brown hares are present across the distribution range of maras, which are endemic to Argentina’s open steppes. Food competition with exotic herbivores could be partially responsible for declines in mara populations. Diets of sympatric hares and maras were compared to detect dietary overla...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2014 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Recursos: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositório: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/34029 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/34029 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Arid Environments Caviidae Feeding Ecology Leporidae Resource Partitioning https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| Resumo: | Introduced brown hares are present across the distribution range of maras, which are endemic to Argentina’s open steppes. Food competition with exotic herbivores could be partially responsible for declines in mara populations. Diets of sympatric hares and maras were compared to detect dietary overlap according to food availability. Diets and availability were estimated using microhistological analysis and point-quadrat transects, over four seasons. Horn’s index estimated dietary overlap, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA detected significant differences, and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PerMANOVA) determined the multivariate response to factors. Grasses prevailed among available items and in both diets. Plant cover and richness increased in summer and forbs in spring. High dietary overlap decreased in autumn-winter, when hares ate more forbs and tall shrubs and less low shrubs than maras. Interspecific overlap was higher inside a protected area with higher food diversity, more forbs, and low shrubs. Both herbivores shifted to different foods as availability decreased. When forbs declined, they were less eaten by maras than hares. Broader habitat use allows hares to search for preferred forbs farther away than maras. The more adaptive hare could become a stronger competitor in impacted environments. Better food availability inside than outside the protected area is a feeding advantage for the coexistence of these herbivores. |
|---|