Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina

Cattle trampling during grazing of crop residue may cause physical soil damage that may be repaired when animals are excluded. Understanding the interplay between soil deterioration and natural recovery of the soil physical condition allows for a better understanding of grazing management systems. V...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Fernández, Patricia Lilia, Alvarez, Carina Rosa, Taboada, Miguel Angel
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2015
Country:Argentina
Institution:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repository:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/41587
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/41587
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Temporal Assessment
Soil Physical Properties
Grazing Crop Residues
Harvest
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
id AR_d4a0eacc54b2514c19adcc3cd0982167
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/41587
network_acronym_str AR
network_name_str Argentina
repository_id_str
spelling Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of ArgentinaFernández, Patricia LiliaAlvarez, Carina RosaTaboada, Miguel AngelTemporal AssessmentSoil Physical PropertiesGrazing Crop ResiduesHarvesthttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Cattle trampling during grazing of crop residue may cause physical soil damage that may be repaired when animals are excluded. Understanding the interplay between soil deterioration and natural recovery of the soil physical condition allows for a better understanding of grazing management systems. Various soil physical properties (i.e., bulk density (BD), penetration resistance (PR), infiltration rate, structural instability) were determined up to 20 cm depth in a silty loam Typic Argiudoll and a sandy loam Typic Hapludoll of the Argentine Pampas from 2005 to 2008. Sampling was carried out before and after grazing, and at different moments of the crop cycle including harvest event. Grazing winter residues and weeds did not lead to the expected compaction processes (e.g., in average BD difference between after grazing and before grazing was from 0.072 to +0.137 Mg m3 for both soils under grazing). In general, physical soil conditions improved during winter, independently of grazing. This might be related to the intrinsic soil characteristics (organic matter content, moisture, clay content) or grazing system (stocking rate, duration of grazing period), which prevented soil physical damage, suggesting that recovery forces were greater than grazing stress. Cropping to maize and soybean showed similar value or improved soil physical properties respect to the after grazing (e.g., in average PR difference between before harvest and after grazing was from +409 to 2561 kPa for both soils), acting as biotic a recovery factor. However, massive damage was harvest operation led to the highest soil deterioration (e.g., in average PR difference between before harvest and after harvest was 985 kPa).Fil: Fernández, Patricia Lilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelos; ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Carina Rosa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelos; ArgentinaFil: Taboada, Miguel Angel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Suelos; ArgentinaElsevier Science2015-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/41587Fernández, Patricia Lilia; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel; Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina; Elsevier Science; Soil & Tillage Research; 153; 11-2015; 86-940167-1987CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198715001117info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.still.2015.05.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T13:41:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/41587instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 13:41:50.389CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
title Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
spellingShingle Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
Fernández, Patricia Lilia
Temporal Assessment
Soil Physical Properties
Grazing Crop Residues
Harvest
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
title_short Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
title_full Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
title_fullStr Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
title_sort Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fernández, Patricia Lilia
Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author Fernández, Patricia Lilia
author_facet Fernández, Patricia Lilia
Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author_role author
author2 Alvarez, Carina Rosa
Taboada, Miguel Angel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Temporal Assessment
Soil Physical Properties
Grazing Crop Residues
Harvest
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
topic Temporal Assessment
Soil Physical Properties
Grazing Crop Residues
Harvest
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
description Cattle trampling during grazing of crop residue may cause physical soil damage that may be repaired when animals are excluded. Understanding the interplay between soil deterioration and natural recovery of the soil physical condition allows for a better understanding of grazing management systems. Various soil physical properties (i.e., bulk density (BD), penetration resistance (PR), infiltration rate, structural instability) were determined up to 20 cm depth in a silty loam Typic Argiudoll and a sandy loam Typic Hapludoll of the Argentine Pampas from 2005 to 2008. Sampling was carried out before and after grazing, and at different moments of the crop cycle including harvest event. Grazing winter residues and weeds did not lead to the expected compaction processes (e.g., in average BD difference between after grazing and before grazing was from 0.072 to +0.137 Mg m3 for both soils under grazing). In general, physical soil conditions improved during winter, independently of grazing. This might be related to the intrinsic soil characteristics (organic matter content, moisture, clay content) or grazing system (stocking rate, duration of grazing period), which prevented soil physical damage, suggesting that recovery forces were greater than grazing stress. Cropping to maize and soybean showed similar value or improved soil physical properties respect to the after grazing (e.g., in average PR difference between before harvest and after grazing was from +409 to 2561 kPa for both soils), acting as biotic a recovery factor. However, massive damage was harvest operation led to the highest soil deterioration (e.g., in average PR difference between before harvest and after harvest was 985 kPa).
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/41587
Fernández, Patricia Lilia; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel; Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina; Elsevier Science; Soil & Tillage Research; 153; 11-2015; 86-94
0167-1987
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/41587
identifier_str_mv Fernández, Patricia Lilia; Alvarez, Carina Rosa; Taboada, Miguel Angel; Topsoil compaction and recovery in integrated no-tilled crop–livestock systems of Argentina; Elsevier Science; Soil & Tillage Research; 153; 11-2015; 86-94
0167-1987
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198715001117
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.still.2015.05.008
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1799195032699273216
score 15.812429

Similar Items