L'argumentation dans Le Mythe de Sisyphe d'Albert Camus

The purpose of this article is to describe and analyze the argumentative path adopted by Albert Camus in Le Mythe de Sisyphe, more precisely in a chapter indicated below with the same title. The analysis is intended to be linguistic and to follow the pragmatic perspective. Some questions will be rai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Beji, Jihene, Chaouch, Zoubeir, Zemn, Bahia, Dahmani, Sana, Almutairi, Mashael
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:Argentina
Institución:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
Repositorio:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
Idioma:francés
OAI Identifier:oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr15196
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.15196/pr.15196.pdf
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Lingüística
Argue
Ethos
Loogos
Pathos
Scheme
Páthos
Argumenter
Logos
Schéma
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this article is to describe and analyze the argumentative path adopted by Albert Camus in Le Mythe de Sisyphe, more precisely in a chapter indicated below with the same title. The analysis is intended to be linguistic and to follow the pragmatic perspective. Some questions will be raised, mostly relating to the argumentative approach (illustrated by the means implemented, the aim of the argumentator, the expected perlocutionary effect) and a final question will relate to the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the argumentative enterprise of the author.