Adverse social determinats and risk for congenital anomalies

Introduction: Different studies have related familiar and regional adverse social conditions to perinatal outcome (neonatal mortality, low birth weight and prematurity); however, few studies have studied the effect of poverty on congenital anomalies. Objective:To assess the hazard ratio of 25 congen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pawluk, Mariela Soledad, Campaña, Hebe, Gili, Juan Antonio, Comas, Belén, Giménez, Lucas Gabriel, Villalba, María Inés, Scala, Sandra C., Poletta, Fernando Adrián, López Camelo, Jorge Santiago
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2014
País:Argentina
Institución:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Repositorio:SEDICI (UNLP)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/101463
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/101463
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ciencias Médicas
Anomalías Congénitas
Inequidad
Labio Leporino
Comunicación interventricular
Congenital anomalies
Iinequities
Cleft lip
Ventricular septal defect
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Different studies have related familiar and regional adverse social conditions to perinatal outcome (neonatal mortality, low birth weight and prematurity); however, few studies have studied the effect of poverty on congenital anomalies. Objective:To assess the hazard ratio of 25 congenital anomalies and adverse social determinants as per the socioeconomic level of families and regions. Population and methods: Exploratory, casecontrol study using data from the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (Estudio Colaborativo Latinoamericano de Malformaciones Congénitas, ECLAMC). The sample consisted of 3786 live newborn infants with a single malformation and 13 344 controls selected among 546 129 births occurred in 39 hospitals from Argentina in the 1992- 2001 period. Both direct and indirect (residence) risks (OR) were estimated, together with the interaction between the individual and residential socioeconomic levels for each of the 25 congenital anomalies. Results: Cleft lip with/without cleft palate (OR= 1.43) and ventricular septal defect (OR= 1.38) showed a significantly higher risk in the lower socioeconomic level. Low socioeconomic levels were significantly associated with a higher frequency of parental sibship (blood relationship), native descent, maternal age younger than 19 years old, more than four pregnancies, a low number of antenatal care visits, and residence in deprived regions. Conclusion: Cleft lip with/without cleft palate and ventricular septal defects were significantly associated with a lower socioeconomic level. Lack of family planning and antenatal care, and exposure to environmental or teratogenic agents may account for these findings.