La red de familia capitulares de Buenos Aires (1700-1820): Dinámica y ciclos de preeminencia
In any group of power the prestige of the families that make up the group varies in time. By studying these variations we can better comprehend the evolution and the span of life of the inner cycle of power of these groups. In this article we study the dynamic of the nuclear families of the Cabildo...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165199 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/165199 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL NETWORKS BUENOS AIRES CAPITULAR ELITE DYNAMIC NETWORKS PREEMINENCE CYCLE SOCIAL STRUCTURE ESTRUCTURA SOCIAL ELITE CAPITULAR ANÁLISIS DE REDES SOCIALES REDES DINÁMICAS https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| Sumario: | In any group of power the prestige of the families that make up the group varies in time. By studying these variations we can better comprehend the evolution and the span of life of the inner cycle of power of these groups. In this article we study the dynamic of the nuclear families of the Cabildo of Buenos Aires from 1700 to 1820. We apply an approach of analysis of social networks that allows us to perceive how nuclear families emerge by marriage and expand on bloodline and reproduction, as well as by ritual ties through sponsor institutions, commercial and political associations. We found, in this sense, a hierarchical class of families based on different criteria of individual importance within the network that ultimately depend on economic support related to different activities, to social attributes such as racial purity, distinction of social classes or bloodlines as well as by carrying relevant political positions in the council. We illustrate our analysis with visualizations and estimates of the relative importance of each family and how this importance varied during the analyzed period of time. |
|---|