Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference
We propose a revision operator on a stratified belief base, i.e., a belief base that stores beliefs in different strata corresponding to the value an agent assigns to these beliefs. Furthermore, the operator will be defined as to perform the revision in such a way that information is never lost upon...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2013 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/12412 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/12412 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Belief Revision Agm Model Argumentation Systems https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| id |
AR_bc1235ce4e1b15b5ca6ea1cdc4cf34af |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/12412 |
| network_acronym_str |
AR |
| network_name_str |
Argentina |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative InferenceFalappa, Marcelo AlejandroGarcia, Alejandro JavierKern Isberner, Gabriele Simari, Guillermo RicardoBelief RevisionAgm ModelArgumentation Systemshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We propose a revision operator on a stratified belief base, i.e., a belief base that stores beliefs in different strata corresponding to the value an agent assigns to these beliefs. Furthermore, the operator will be defined as to perform the revision in such a way that information is never lost upon revision but stored in a stratum or layer containing information perceived as having a lower value. In this manner, if the revision of one layer leads to the rejection of some information to maintain consistency, instead of being withdrawn it will be kept and introduced in a different layer with lower value. Throughout this development we will follow the principle of minimal change, being one of the important principles proposed in belief change theory, particularly emphasized in the AGM model. Regarding the reasoning part from the stratified belief base, the agent will obtain the inferences using an argumentative formalism. Thus, the argumentation framework will decide which information prevails when sentences of different layers are used for entailing conflicting beliefs. We will also illustrate how inferences are changed and how the status of arguments can be modified after a revision process.Fil: Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Garcia, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Kern Isberner, Gabriele . Universitat Dortmund; AlemaniaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaSpringer2013-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/12412Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; Garcia, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele ; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference; Springer; Journal of Philosophical Logic; 42; 1; 2-2013; 161-1930022-36111573-0433enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10992-011-9217-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9217-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T13:33:15Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/12412instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 13:33:15.393CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference |
| title |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference |
| spellingShingle |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro Belief Revision Agm Model Argumentation Systems https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| title_short |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference |
| title_full |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference |
| title_fullStr |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference |
| title_sort |
Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro Garcia, Alejandro Javier Kern Isberner, Gabriele Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author |
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro Garcia, Alejandro Javier Kern Isberner, Gabriele Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Garcia, Alejandro Javier Kern Isberner, Gabriele Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Belief Revision Agm Model Argumentation Systems https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| topic |
Belief Revision Agm Model Argumentation Systems https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| description |
We propose a revision operator on a stratified belief base, i.e., a belief base that stores beliefs in different strata corresponding to the value an agent assigns to these beliefs. Furthermore, the operator will be defined as to perform the revision in such a way that information is never lost upon revision but stored in a stratum or layer containing information perceived as having a lower value. In this manner, if the revision of one layer leads to the rejection of some information to maintain consistency, instead of being withdrawn it will be kept and introduced in a different layer with lower value. Throughout this development we will follow the principle of minimal change, being one of the important principles proposed in belief change theory, particularly emphasized in the AGM model. Regarding the reasoning part from the stratified belief base, the agent will obtain the inferences using an argumentative formalism. Thus, the argumentation framework will decide which information prevails when sentences of different layers are used for entailing conflicting beliefs. We will also illustrate how inferences are changed and how the status of arguments can be modified after a revision process. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/12412 Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; Garcia, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele ; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference; Springer; Journal of Philosophical Logic; 42; 1; 2-2013; 161-193 0022-3611 1573-0433 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/12412 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; Garcia, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele ; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Stratified Belief Bases Revision with Argumentative Inference; Springer; Journal of Philosophical Logic; 42; 1; 2-2013; 161-193 0022-3611 1573-0433 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10992-011-9217-z info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9217-z |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1799194635964252160 |
| score |
15,811543 |