Body size in Drosophila: Genetic architecture, allometries and sexual dimorphism

Even though substantial progress has been made to elucidate the physiological and environmental factors underpinning differences in body size, little is known about its genetic architecture. Furthermore, all animal species bear a specific relationship between the size of each organ and overall body...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Carreira, V.P., Mensch, J., Fanara, J.J.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2009
País:Argentina
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
Repositorio:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:paperaa:paper_0018067X_v102_n3_p246_Carreira
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0018067X_v102_n3_p246_Carreira
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Allometry
Body size
Drosophila melanogaster
Genetic architecture
P-element mutagenesis
Sexual dimorphism
Drosophila protein
allometry
body size
environmental factor
evolutionary biology
fly
genetics
mutagenicity
sexual dimorphism
animal
article
female
gene expression regulation
male
physiology
quantitative trait
sexual development
Animals
Body Size
Drosophila Proteins
Female
Male
Mutagenesis, Insertional
Quantitative Trait, Heritable
Sex Characteristics
Animalia
Descripción
Sumario:Even though substantial progress has been made to elucidate the physiological and environmental factors underpinning differences in body size, little is known about its genetic architecture. Furthermore, all animal species bear a specific relationship between the size of each organ and overall body size, so different body size traits should be investigated as well as their sexual dimorphism that may have an important impact on the evolution of body size. We have surveyed 191 co-isogenic lines of Drosophila melanogaster, each one of them homozygous for a single P-element insertion, and assessed the effects of mutations on different body size traits compared to the P-element-free co-isogenic control. Nearly 60% of the lines showed significant differences with respect to the control for these traits in one or both sexes and almost 35% showed trait- and sex-specific effects. Candidate gene mutations frequently increased body size in males and decreased it in females. Among the 92 genes identified, most are involved in development and/or metabolic processes and their molecular functions principally include protein-binding and nucleic acid-binding activities. Although several genes showed pleiotropic effects in relation to body size, few of them were involved in the expression of all traits in one or both sexes. These genes seem to be important for different aspects related to the general functioning of the organism. In general, our results indicate that the genetic architecture of body size traits involves a large fraction of the genome and is largely sex and trait specific. © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.