Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
In this article, I analyze an apparent contradiction in Kant´s formulation of the "postulate of public right", in the § 42 of the Doctrine of Right, with the aim of studying Kant´s categorical foundation of the State. Taken at face value, the passage entails a contradiction because it stat...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Recursos: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51867 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51867 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Kant Doctrina del Derecho Exeundum Estado https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| id |
AR_adb76c96d045f2c489ec203f84d53dbd |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51867 |
| network_acronym_str |
AR |
| network_name_str |
Argentina |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de KantMarey, MacarenaKantDoctrina del DerechoExeundumEstadohttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this article, I analyze an apparent contradiction in Kant´s formulation of the "postulate of public right", in the § 42 of the Doctrine of Right, with the aim of studying Kant´s categorical foundation of the State. Taken at face value, the passage entails a contradiction because it states that [A] the practical necessity of the exeundum follows from private right, that is, from the problems posed by the state of nature, while at the same time it says that [B] the conceptual ground of the exeundum can be developed analytically from the concept of right, which Kant treats in a theoretical level systematically previous to the state of nature. First, I will analyze the statement [A] and try to clear up what "private right in the state of nature" means, reviewing -and rejecting- two possible constructions of it. The next step will be to study statement [B]. I will propose that this latter statement shows that the concept of right and the notion of juridical obligation attached to it are the ground of the inference that goes from "private right in the state of nature" to the "postulate of private right". Finally, I will advance the thesis that "private right in the state of nature" is the a priori condition of the categorical duty to leave the state of nature, as it serves to describe the normative consequences of the "situation of unavoidable coexistence", and that the "concept of right in external relations" is the normative criterion used to analyze that situation. In this way, statements [A] and [B] are both true and Kant´s formulation of the exeundum is no longer contradictory.Fil: Marey, Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaFabrizio Serra2014-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/51867Marey, Macarena; Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant; Fabrizio Serra; Historia Philosophica; 12; 12-2014; 33-501724-61211824-095XCONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1400/230765info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digital.casalini.it/10.1400/230765info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.libraweb.net/riviste.php?chiave=5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T14:05:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51867instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 14:05:25.547CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant |
| title |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant |
| spellingShingle |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant Marey, Macarena Kant Doctrina del Derecho Exeundum Estado https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| title_short |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant |
| title_full |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant |
| title_fullStr |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant |
| title_sort |
Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Marey, Macarena |
| author |
Marey, Macarena |
| author_facet |
Marey, Macarena |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Kant Doctrina del Derecho Exeundum Estado https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| topic |
Kant Doctrina del Derecho Exeundum Estado https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| description |
In this article, I analyze an apparent contradiction in Kant´s formulation of the "postulate of public right", in the § 42 of the Doctrine of Right, with the aim of studying Kant´s categorical foundation of the State. Taken at face value, the passage entails a contradiction because it states that [A] the practical necessity of the exeundum follows from private right, that is, from the problems posed by the state of nature, while at the same time it says that [B] the conceptual ground of the exeundum can be developed analytically from the concept of right, which Kant treats in a theoretical level systematically previous to the state of nature. First, I will analyze the statement [A] and try to clear up what "private right in the state of nature" means, reviewing -and rejecting- two possible constructions of it. The next step will be to study statement [B]. I will propose that this latter statement shows that the concept of right and the notion of juridical obligation attached to it are the ground of the inference that goes from "private right in the state of nature" to the "postulate of private right". Finally, I will advance the thesis that "private right in the state of nature" is the a priori condition of the categorical duty to leave the state of nature, as it serves to describe the normative consequences of the "situation of unavoidable coexistence", and that the "concept of right in external relations" is the normative criterion used to analyze that situation. In this way, statements [A] and [B] are both true and Kant´s formulation of the exeundum is no longer contradictory. |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51867 Marey, Macarena; Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant; Fabrizio Serra; Historia Philosophica; 12; 12-2014; 33-50 1724-6121 1824-095X CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51867 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Marey, Macarena; Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant; Fabrizio Serra; Historia Philosophica; 12; 12-2014; 33-50 1724-6121 1824-095X CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1400/230765 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digital.casalini.it/10.1400/230765 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.libraweb.net/riviste.php?chiave=5 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fabrizio Serra |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fabrizio Serra |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1799195834666975232 |
| score |
15.812429 |