Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] represents, on average, 60% of total nitrogen (N) uptake. Nitrogen dilution curves link aboveground crop N concentration (%N) to biomass accumulation (W). It has been reported that BNF is an energy-intensive process that might re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Santachiara, Gabriel, Salvagiotti, Fernando, Gerde, Jose Arnaldo, Rotundo, José Luis
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:Argentina
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositorio:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90378
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90378
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN
FERTILIZATION
MINERAL SOIL ABSORPTION
NUTRITION
RHIZOBIUM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
id AR_ad5f409fb6e91ae89638fdacfbc2a9dd
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90378
network_acronym_str AR
network_name_str Argentina
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
spellingShingle Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
Santachiara, Gabriel
ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN
FERTILIZATION
MINERAL SOIL ABSORPTION
NUTRITION
RHIZOBIUM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
title_short Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_full Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_fullStr Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_full_unstemmed Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_sort Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Santachiara, Gabriel
Salvagiotti, Fernando
Gerde, Jose Arnaldo
Rotundo, José Luis
author Santachiara, Gabriel
author_facet Santachiara, Gabriel
Salvagiotti, Fernando
Gerde, Jose Arnaldo
Rotundo, José Luis
author_role author
author2 Salvagiotti, Fernando
Gerde, Jose Arnaldo
Rotundo, José Luis
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN
FERTILIZATION
MINERAL SOIL ABSORPTION
NUTRITION
RHIZOBIUM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
topic ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN
FERTILIZATION
MINERAL SOIL ABSORPTION
NUTRITION
RHIZOBIUM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
description Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] represents, on average, 60% of total nitrogen (N) uptake. Nitrogen dilution curves link aboveground crop N concentration (%N) to biomass accumulation (W). It has been reported that BNF is an energy-intensive process that might reduce biomass production per unit of captured N (physiological N use efficiency or NUE). This increased energy cost could lead to a more attenuated N (i.e. less efficient) dilution curve. However, there are no reports comparing N dilution curves for soybean crops differing in N source. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the impact of BNF on soybean N dilution curves and how it influences NUE, and (ii) establish independent N dilution curves for soil and atmospheric N. Our working hypothesis is that relying on BNF attenuates the N dilution curve and reduces NUE. The experiment consisted of a control and a fertilized treatment, 0 and 600 kg N ha−1 respectively, applied to four soybean genotypes in order to establish two differential BNF situations. While the control and fertilized treatments had differential N accumulation from BNF, ∼70% and ∼16%, respectively, there were no differences observed in seed yield (∼5000 kg ha−1), NUE (∼36 kg kg−1) and only slight differences in total N uptake (∼365 kg N ha−1 in fertilized treatment compared to ∼389 kg h−1 in the control treatment). Results suggest that reliance on BNF for N does not influence substantially the attenuation of the N dilution curve and has no impact on NUE. The N dilution parameter (“b”) ranged from −0.128 to −0.218 among cultivars and fertilization treatments. The less negative values (more attenuated curve) corresponded to the fertilized plots likely associated with luxury N consumption. Interestingly, dilution curves from soil mineral N showed the typical dilution pattern, while N derived from the atmosphere followed a concentration pattern as the crop developed. This most likely reflects the continuous N flux from BNF to the plant as opposed to the decreasing soil mineral N supply. Recognizing these concentration/dilution curves for atmospheric and soil N has three immediate implications. First, the atmospheric N concentration curve might indicate an upper benchmark for evaluating symbiosis performance during crop development. Second, the concentration pattern observed for BNF could potentially help to reverse the observed decline in seed protein concentration in modern soybean cultivars. Third, the N concentration/dilution curves for the individual N sources could be incorporated into crop models for estimating BNF at different crop biomass levels during soybean development.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90378
Santachiara, Gabriel; Salvagiotti, Fernando; Gerde, Jose Arnaldo; Rotundo, José Luis; Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 223; 6-2018; 171-178
0378-4290
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90378
identifier_str_mv Santachiara, Gabriel; Salvagiotti, Fernando; Gerde, Jose Arnaldo; Rotundo, José Luis; Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 223; 6-2018; 171-178
0378-4290
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429017316143
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.001
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1799194699203870720
spelling Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?Santachiara, GabrielSalvagiotti, FernandoGerde, Jose ArnaldoRotundo, José LuisATMOSPHERIC NITROGENFERTILIZATIONMINERAL SOIL ABSORPTIONNUTRITIONRHIZOBIUMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] represents, on average, 60% of total nitrogen (N) uptake. Nitrogen dilution curves link aboveground crop N concentration (%N) to biomass accumulation (W). It has been reported that BNF is an energy-intensive process that might reduce biomass production per unit of captured N (physiological N use efficiency or NUE). This increased energy cost could lead to a more attenuated N (i.e. less efficient) dilution curve. However, there are no reports comparing N dilution curves for soybean crops differing in N source. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the impact of BNF on soybean N dilution curves and how it influences NUE, and (ii) establish independent N dilution curves for soil and atmospheric N. Our working hypothesis is that relying on BNF attenuates the N dilution curve and reduces NUE. The experiment consisted of a control and a fertilized treatment, 0 and 600 kg N ha−1 respectively, applied to four soybean genotypes in order to establish two differential BNF situations. While the control and fertilized treatments had differential N accumulation from BNF, ∼70% and ∼16%, respectively, there were no differences observed in seed yield (∼5000 kg ha−1), NUE (∼36 kg kg−1) and only slight differences in total N uptake (∼365 kg N ha−1 in fertilized treatment compared to ∼389 kg h−1 in the control treatment). Results suggest that reliance on BNF for N does not influence substantially the attenuation of the N dilution curve and has no impact on NUE. The N dilution parameter (“b”) ranged from −0.128 to −0.218 among cultivars and fertilization treatments. The less negative values (more attenuated curve) corresponded to the fertilized plots likely associated with luxury N consumption. Interestingly, dilution curves from soil mineral N showed the typical dilution pattern, while N derived from the atmosphere followed a concentration pattern as the crop developed. This most likely reflects the continuous N flux from BNF to the plant as opposed to the decreasing soil mineral N supply. Recognizing these concentration/dilution curves for atmospheric and soil N has three immediate implications. First, the atmospheric N concentration curve might indicate an upper benchmark for evaluating symbiosis performance during crop development. Second, the concentration pattern observed for BNF could potentially help to reverse the observed decline in seed protein concentration in modern soybean cultivars. Third, the N concentration/dilution curves for the individual N sources could be incorporated into crop models for estimating BNF at different crop biomass levels during soybean development.Fil: Santachiara, Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gerde, Jose Arnaldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario; ArgentinaFil: Rotundo, José Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario; ArgentinaElsevier Science2018-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/90378Santachiara, Gabriel; Salvagiotti, Fernando; Gerde, Jose Arnaldo; Rotundo, José Luis; Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 223; 6-2018; 171-1780378-4290CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429017316143info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T13:34:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90378instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 13:34:25.915CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
score 15,812429