Fichte y Deleuze: potencias y paradojas del afinismo radical
The presence of Fichte's thought in the work of Deleuze is scarce, but nonetheless quiet suggestive, to the extent that in a recent paper Jean-Cristophe Goddard attempts a quest of an extreme affinity between both authors. In this paper I describe, firstly, the main appearances of Fichte in the...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/36499 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/36499 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fichte Deleuze Autoactividad pasiva Elemento genético https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| Sumario: | The presence of Fichte's thought in the work of Deleuze is scarce, but nonetheless quiet suggestive, to the extent that in a recent paper Jean-Cristophe Goddard attempts a quest of an extreme affinity between both authors. In this paper I describe, firstly, the main appearances of Fichte in the work of Deleuze, and then I focus, trough the notes that the French philosopher attributes in general to “post-Kantianism”, on a reconstruction of a Deleuzian interpretation of Fichte's ontology, with its merits and flaws. On this basis, I explore the advantages offered by the perspective of affinity, but also the controversial consequences of such a deleuzianisation of the Fichtean legacy. |
|---|