Higher-Order Interactions (Bipolar or not) in Abstract Argumentation: A State of the Art

In Dungs seminal work, an argumentation framework was defined by a set of abstract arguments and a binary (and also abstract) relation between these arguments, called attack relation and expressing conflicts between arguments. Due to its simplicity and the power of its abstraction, this representati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cayrol, Claudette, Cohen, Andrea, Lagasquie Schiex, Marie Christine
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:Argentina
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositorio:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/157653
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/157653
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
BIPOLAR INTERACTIONS
HIGHER-ORDER INTERACTIONS
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
Descripción
Sumario:In Dungs seminal work, an argumentation framework was defined by a set of abstract arguments and a binary (and also abstract) relation between these arguments, called attack relation and expressing conflicts between arguments. Due to its simplicity and the power of its abstraction, this representation has been intensively used by the community for over 25 years. Another advantage of this approach is the ease with which we can extend the framework, weighting arguments or attacks, using priorities or pre-orderings on the sets of arguments, considering that these interactions are no longer binary ones over the set of arguments (e.g. collective attacks), adding new kinds of interactions (e.g. supports), and proposing that the targets of these interactions can also be interactions themselves (i.e. higher-order interactions). These last two points are the core of this chapter, in which we present a survey of the proposed approaches existing around the notion of higher-order interactions (attacks and supports) in an abstract argumentation framework.