Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton

Although contamination and invasive species are two of the most relevant anthropogenic drivers affecting ecosystems, their joint impact on the environment has been poorly investigated. Glyphosate, directly or indirectly, contaminates freshwater systems which in turn may be invaded by the golden muss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela, Gattás, Florencia María, Vinocur, Alicia Liliana, Cristos, Diego Sebastián, Rojas, D., Cataldo, Daniel Hugo, Pizarro, Haydee Norma
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:Argentina
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositorio:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/86954
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/86954
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS
FRESHWATER
GLIFOSATO ATANOR®
GLYPHOSATE
LIMNOPERNA FORTUNEI
MICROCOSMS
ROUNDUP MAX®
SYNERGISM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
id AR_77b42e2bc9f5855bbb032d34d4e9a248
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/86954
network_acronym_str AR
network_name_str Argentina
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
title Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
spellingShingle Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela
ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS
FRESHWATER
GLIFOSATO ATANOR®
GLYPHOSATE
LIMNOPERNA FORTUNEI
MICROCOSMS
ROUNDUP MAX®
SYNERGISM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
title_short Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
title_full Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
title_fullStr Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
title_full_unstemmed Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
title_sort Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela
Gattás, Florencia María
Vinocur, Alicia Liliana
Cristos, Diego Sebastián
Rojas, D.
Cataldo, Daniel Hugo
Pizarro, Haydee Norma
author de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela
author_facet de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela
Gattás, Florencia María
Vinocur, Alicia Liliana
Cristos, Diego Sebastián
Rojas, D.
Cataldo, Daniel Hugo
Pizarro, Haydee Norma
author_role author
author2 Gattás, Florencia María
Vinocur, Alicia Liliana
Cristos, Diego Sebastián
Rojas, D.
Cataldo, Daniel Hugo
Pizarro, Haydee Norma
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS
FRESHWATER
GLIFOSATO ATANOR®
GLYPHOSATE
LIMNOPERNA FORTUNEI
MICROCOSMS
ROUNDUP MAX®
SYNERGISM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
topic ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS
FRESHWATER
GLIFOSATO ATANOR®
GLYPHOSATE
LIMNOPERNA FORTUNEI
MICROCOSMS
ROUNDUP MAX®
SYNERGISM
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
description Although contamination and invasive species are two of the most relevant anthropogenic drivers affecting ecosystems, their joint impact on the environment has been poorly investigated. Glyphosate, directly or indirectly, contaminates freshwater systems which in turn may be invaded by the golden mussel Limnoperna fortunei. Under laboratory conditions, we studied the combined effect of technical-grade glyphosate, Roundup Max® and Glifosato Atanor®, in scenarios with and without L. fortunei, on phytoplankton from Salto Grande Reservoir (Uruguay River, Argentina). We expected that the effects of the interaction on phytoplankton and water quality would vary with the form of herbicide applied. The assay was conducted for 14 days (Tf) using 3-L bottles as experimental units. Eight treatments were performed in triplicate: C: Control; M: mussel; G: technical-grade glyphosate acid; R: Roundup Max®; A: Glifosato Atanor®; MG: mussel + technical-grade glyphosate acid, MA: mussel + Glifosato Atanor® and MR: mussel + Roundup Max®. The active ingredient was applied at 6 ppm. The dissipation of glyphosate in water was 1.5–2.6 times higher in presence of mussels. Treatments G and A showed an increase in phytoplankton abundance, mainly the cyanobacteria Microcystis spp. wich rised to 289% and 639% at Tf, respectively, relative to their values at Ti. Roundup Max® limited the growth of Microcystis spp., as its abundance decreased 59% relative to Ti. L. fortunei reduced phytoplankton abundances at Tf. Evenness increased significantly in M, MG, MR and MA, while it decreased in G, R and A relative to C. The interaction of factors produced a significant synergistic increase in periphyton; periphytic chlorophyll a concentration was 0.81 ± 0.02 μg cm−2 for MR; 0.09 ± 0.02 μg cm−2 for MA and 0.02 ± 0.01 μg cm−2 for MG. Limnoperna fortunei appeared as the driving force in the interaction. The assay described here allows for the rapid assessment of the impact of these types of agents on freshwater.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/86954
de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela; Gattás, Florencia María; Vinocur, Alicia Liliana; Cristos, Diego Sebastián; Rojas, D.; et al.; Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 85; 2-2018; 575-584
1470-160X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/86954
identifier_str_mv de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela; Gattás, Florencia María; Vinocur, Alicia Liliana; Cristos, Diego Sebastián; Rojas, D.; et al.; Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 85; 2-2018; 575-584
1470-160X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.021
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X17307331
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1799195792469131264
spelling Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplanktonde Stefano, Lucia GabrielaGattás, Florencia MaríaVinocur, Alicia LilianaCristos, Diego SebastiánRojas, D.Cataldo, Daniel HugoPizarro, Haydee NormaANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORSFRESHWATERGLIFOSATO ATANOR®GLYPHOSATELIMNOPERNA FORTUNEIMICROCOSMSROUNDUP MAX®SYNERGISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Although contamination and invasive species are two of the most relevant anthropogenic drivers affecting ecosystems, their joint impact on the environment has been poorly investigated. Glyphosate, directly or indirectly, contaminates freshwater systems which in turn may be invaded by the golden mussel Limnoperna fortunei. Under laboratory conditions, we studied the combined effect of technical-grade glyphosate, Roundup Max® and Glifosato Atanor®, in scenarios with and without L. fortunei, on phytoplankton from Salto Grande Reservoir (Uruguay River, Argentina). We expected that the effects of the interaction on phytoplankton and water quality would vary with the form of herbicide applied. The assay was conducted for 14 days (Tf) using 3-L bottles as experimental units. Eight treatments were performed in triplicate: C: Control; M: mussel; G: technical-grade glyphosate acid; R: Roundup Max®; A: Glifosato Atanor®; MG: mussel + technical-grade glyphosate acid, MA: mussel + Glifosato Atanor® and MR: mussel + Roundup Max®. The active ingredient was applied at 6 ppm. The dissipation of glyphosate in water was 1.5–2.6 times higher in presence of mussels. Treatments G and A showed an increase in phytoplankton abundance, mainly the cyanobacteria Microcystis spp. wich rised to 289% and 639% at Tf, respectively, relative to their values at Ti. Roundup Max® limited the growth of Microcystis spp., as its abundance decreased 59% relative to Ti. L. fortunei reduced phytoplankton abundances at Tf. Evenness increased significantly in M, MG, MR and MA, while it decreased in G, R and A relative to C. The interaction of factors produced a significant synergistic increase in periphyton; periphytic chlorophyll a concentration was 0.81 ± 0.02 μg cm−2 for MR; 0.09 ± 0.02 μg cm−2 for MA and 0.02 ± 0.01 μg cm−2 for MG. Limnoperna fortunei appeared as the driving force in the interaction. The assay described here allows for the rapid assessment of the impact of these types of agents on freshwater.Fil: de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaFil: Gattás, Florencia María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaFil: Vinocur, Alicia Liliana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaFil: Cristos, Diego Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Agroindustria. Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos; ArgentinaFil: Rojas, D.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaFil: Cataldo, Daniel Hugo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaFil: Pizarro, Haydee Norma. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaElsevier Science2018-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/86954de Stefano, Lucia Gabriela; Gattás, Florencia María; Vinocur, Alicia Liliana; Cristos, Diego Sebastián; Rojas, D.; et al.; Comparative impact of two glyphosate-based formulations in interaction with Limnoperna fortunei on freshwater phytoplankton; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 85; 2-2018; 575-5841470-160XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.021info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X17307331info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T14:03:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/86954instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 14:03:39.806CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
score 15,81155