Otolith elemental fingerprint and scale and otolith morphometry in Prochilodus lineatus provide identification of natal nurseries

The dentification of nursery areas is a basic requirement for fishing management in large rivers. Morphometry (circularity, ellipticity, form factor, rectangularity and roundness indices) and chemistry (Sr:Ca, Ba:Ca and Zn:Ca ratios) of lapilli otolith, and geometric morphometry of scales of juvenil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Avigliano, Esteban, Domanico, Alejandro, Sánchez, Sebastián, Volpedo, Alejandra
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:Argentina
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositorio:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/59278
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/59278
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Morphometry And Microchemistry
Nursery Areas
Otolith
Scale
Streaked Prochilod
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
Descripción
Sumario:The dentification of nursery areas is a basic requirement for fishing management in large rivers. Morphometry (circularity, ellipticity, form factor, rectangularity and roundness indices) and chemistry (Sr:Ca, Ba:Ca and Zn:Ca ratios) of lapilli otolith, and geometric morphometry of scales of juveniles Prochilodus lineatus, were compared in three sites in the Plata Basin, in order to evaluate their applicability to identify possible nursery areas. Otolith microchemistry based on ICP-OES found significant differences in the Ba:Ca and Zn:Ca ratios among sampling sites. When all the combined techniques were considered, the quadratic discriminant analysis (QDFA) showed the highest classification success (89.5–92.9%), in relation to separate techniques classification. Otolith microchemistry, individually considered, appears to be a good and effective tool to identify individual fish from different locations (77.8%–84.2%). Otolith morphometry found significant differences in the ellipticity, circularity and form factor indices between sites. Otolith morphological indices supported results from the elemental study with a success in the allocation of 63.2–78.6%. When considering all variables for scale geometric morphometry, discriminant analysis showed a good percentage of the classification of the individuals (58.3–82.8%). These results indicate that the otolith microchemisty and morphometry and scale morphometry are acceptable markers of habitat and represent a potential tool (in combination or individually) for the identification of streaked prochilod nursery areas.