Dioses, Dios
"We are not jealous of gods, we do not serve them, we do not fear them, but at the risk of our lives, we attest for their multiple existence, and are stirred to be of their chancy keeping when they are no more remembered of". What could mean such a sentence written by René Char? Is it stil...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2008 |
| Country: | Argentina |
| Institution: | Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación |
| Repository: | Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) |
| Language: | Spanish |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jpr3587 |
| Online Access: | https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.3587/pr.3587.pdf https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=arti&d=Jpr3587 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Lingüística Filología Deísmo Creencia Religión Monoteísmo Politeísmo Griego Paganismo Monotheism Greek Polytheism Paganism |
| Summary: | "We are not jealous of gods, we do not serve them, we do not fear them, but at the risk of our lives, we attest for their multiple existence, and are stirred to be of their chancy keeping when they are no more remembered of". What could mean such a sentence written by René Char? Is it still possible to think and to experiment, here and now, after centuries of monotheism, something like a plurality of gods? What is it to be a pagan? Rereading Homer, and then Plato, Nietzsche and Lyotard, we could risk the following de´Çü nition: pagan is someone able to suppose, between performance and cosmos, that the one coming up to him is, may be, some god. |
|---|