Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil

Based on international guidelines, the elaboration of national carbon (C) budgets in many countries has tended to set aside the capacity of grazing lands to sequester C as soil organic carbon (SOC). A widely applied simple method assumes a steady state for SOC stocks in grasslands and a long-term eq...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Ricard, Maria Florencia, Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2019
País:Argentina
Recursos:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Repositório:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/108578
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/11336/108578
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:SOC SEQUESTRATION
GRAZING LANDS
THEORETICAL METHOD
EMPIRICAL VALIDATION
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
id AR_43ffc8bcabf6e557c82213a32f176ff3
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/108578
network_acronym_str AR
network_name_str Argentina
repository_id_str
spelling Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soilRicard, Maria FlorenciaViglizzo, Ernesto FranciscoSOC SEQUESTRATIONGRAZING LANDSTHEORETICAL METHODEMPIRICAL VALIDATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Based on international guidelines, the elaboration of national carbon (C) budgets in many countries has tended to set aside the capacity of grazing lands to sequester C as soil organic carbon (SOC). A widely applied simple method assumes a steady state for SOC stocks in grasslands and a long-term equilibrium between annual C gains and losses. This article presents a theoretical method based on the annual conversion of belowground biomass into SOC to include the capacity of grazing-land soils to sequester C in greenhouse gases (GHG) calculations. Average figures from both methods can be combined with land-use/land-cover data to reassess the net C sequestration of the rural sector from a country. The results of said method were validated with empirical values based on peer-reviewed literature that provided annual data on SOC sequestration. This methodology offers important differences over pre-existing GHG landscape approach calculation methods: • improves the estimation about the capacity of grazing-land soils to sequester C assuming these lands are not in a steady state and • counts C gains when considering that grazing lands are managed at low livestock densities.Fil: Ricard, Maria Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; ArgentinaFil: Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; ArgentinaElsevier2019-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/108578Ricard, Maria Florencia; Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco; Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil; Elsevier; MethodsX; 7; 12-2019; 1-112215-0161CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2019.12.003info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016119303371info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2024-05-08T13:47:43Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/108578instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982024-05-08 13:47:43.721CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
title Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
spellingShingle Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
Ricard, Maria Florencia
SOC SEQUESTRATION
GRAZING LANDS
THEORETICAL METHOD
EMPIRICAL VALIDATION
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
title_short Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
title_full Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
title_fullStr Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
title_full_unstemmed Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
title_sort Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ricard, Maria Florencia
Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco
author Ricard, Maria Florencia
author_facet Ricard, Maria Florencia
Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco
author_role author
author2 Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SOC SEQUESTRATION
GRAZING LANDS
THEORETICAL METHOD
EMPIRICAL VALIDATION
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
topic SOC SEQUESTRATION
GRAZING LANDS
THEORETICAL METHOD
EMPIRICAL VALIDATION
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
description Based on international guidelines, the elaboration of national carbon (C) budgets in many countries has tended to set aside the capacity of grazing lands to sequester C as soil organic carbon (SOC). A widely applied simple method assumes a steady state for SOC stocks in grasslands and a long-term equilibrium between annual C gains and losses. This article presents a theoretical method based on the annual conversion of belowground biomass into SOC to include the capacity of grazing-land soils to sequester C in greenhouse gases (GHG) calculations. Average figures from both methods can be combined with land-use/land-cover data to reassess the net C sequestration of the rural sector from a country. The results of said method were validated with empirical values based on peer-reviewed literature that provided annual data on SOC sequestration. This methodology offers important differences over pre-existing GHG landscape approach calculation methods: • improves the estimation about the capacity of grazing-land soils to sequester C assuming these lands are not in a steady state and • counts C gains when considering that grazing lands are managed at low livestock densities.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/108578
Ricard, Maria Florencia; Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco; Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil; Elsevier; MethodsX; 7; 12-2019; 1-11
2215-0161
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/108578
identifier_str_mv Ricard, Maria Florencia; Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco; Improving carbon sequestration estimation through accounting carbon stored in grassland soil; Elsevier; MethodsX; 7; 12-2019; 1-11
2215-0161
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.mex.2019.12.003
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016119303371
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1799195273755361280
score 15,812455