Relativism in context
The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurabi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/124465 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/124465 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | RELATIVISM CONTEXTUALISM EPISTEME FRAMEWORKS FACTIVE REASON https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| Sumario: | The present paper introduces four fundamental issues within the framework of epistemic relativism: (a) the lack of precisión in the concept of knowing; (b) the changes in demands between context of use and of evaluation; (c) te violation of the real disagreement intuition; and (d) the incommensurability of epistemic frameworks. The answer to these problems should revolve around the idea that knowledge is subject to the interests and intentions of individuals in everyday life. The main tesis thus consists in that it is necesary to avoid the impression that epistemic frameworks are some sort of watertight compartment. In this way, relativism may be defended from the viewpoint that epistemic frameworks are artificial generalizations that may be relevant to the attribution of knowledge. In this respect, it must be borne in mind that some norms are shared by different epistemic frameworks, and that each time a given context or circumstance takes place, the same norm may be applied. |
|---|