Thinking Styles in students of UNMSM

This research deals about the thinking styles proposed by Sternberg, on Freshman students of the Universidad National Mayor de San Marcos (U. N.M. S. M). The participants were a random sample of 501 students, belonging to 19 schools of 5 academic areas of U.N.M.S.M. The results confirm the validity,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Escurra Mayaute, Luis Miguel, Delgado Vásquez, Ana Esther, Quesada Murillo, María Rosario
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2001
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/5004
Acceso en línea:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/5004
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:thinking styles
psychometric analysis
reliability
validity
sternberg
estilos de pensamiento
análisis psicométrico
confiabilidad
validez
Descripción
Sumario:This research deals about the thinking styles proposed by Sternberg, on Freshman students of the Universidad National Mayor de San Marcos (U. N.M. S. M). The participants were a random sample of 501 students, belonging to 19 schools of 5 academic areas of U.N.M.S.M. The results confirm the validity, the construct validity and the reliability of Stenberg 's short form Thinking Styles Questionnaire. The results show that the most frequent styles are the ones related to the judicial junction, the external scope and the hierarchic form on The Least frequent results are the oligarchic form, the local level and the conservative style. Considering academic areas there were statistical differences on the executive and the judicial junction; the monarchic, the hierarchic, the oligarchic and the anarchic forms; the global and local levels; the internal and external scope; the Liberal and conservative styles. Comparing by gender showed statistical significance leniency of male participants on the judicial function; the monarchic form; the global and local level; the external scope; and the Liberal and conservative style.