Right of petition and administrative silence
With unfortunate frequency, public officials in charge of the exercise of public power ignore the requests of the governed for refraining from responding to them, in clear violation of their right to petition and of their fundamental right to good public administration, unlawful only aggravates the...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22407 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/22407 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Affirmative ficta Undue inertia Negative ficta Administrative silence Time Right of petition Afirmativa ficta Indebida inercia Negativa ficta Silencio administrativo Tiempo Derecho de petición |
| Sumario: | With unfortunate frequency, public officials in charge of the exercise of public power ignore the requests of the governed for refraining from responding to them, in clear violation of their right to petition and of their fundamental right to good public administration, unlawful only aggravates the particular interest of the applicant, but its impunity undermines the basis of the rule of law, so it is necessary to reform the current regulations in order to toughen the sanctions to public officials who incur in such misconduct to the detriment of the petitioner, which the legislator has tried to mitigate through the figure of administrative silence. |
|---|