Drop-in energy performance evaluation of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) in a vapour compression system as R134a replacements
[EN] This paper presents an energy performance evaluation of two low-GWP refrigerants, R1234yf and R1234ze(E), as drop-in replacements for R134a. Tests are carried out in a monitored vapor compression system combining different values of evaporation and condensation temperature, and without/with the...
| Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Publication Date: | 2014 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repository: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/96440 |
| Online Access: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/96440 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Drop-in Energy performance R1234yf R1234ze(E) R134a Vapor compression system INGENIERIA NUCLEAR |
| Summary: | [EN] This paper presents an energy performance evaluation of two low-GWP refrigerants, R1234yf and R1234ze(E), as drop-in replacements for R134a. Tests are carried out in a monitored vapor compression system combining different values of evaporation and condensation temperature, and without/with the adoption of an internal heat exchanger. The parameters analyzed are volumetric efficiency, cooling capacity and COP and they are presented taking R134a as baseline. Results show that without IHX the average volumetric efficiency for R1234yf and R1234ze is 4% and 5% lower compared with R134a. The cooling capacity obtained with R1234yf and R1234ze is reduced, with an average difference of 9% and 30% without IHX. Also, COP values are about 7% lower for R1234yf and 6% lower for R1234ze than those obtained using R134a. Finally, the use of an internal heat exchanger reduces the COP differences for both replacements. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
|---|