Influence of the Menstrual Cycle on Performance in CrossFit®

The purpose of this study was to compare the fast maximal dynamic strength, maximal dynamic strength, and muscular endurance changes between the follicular phase (FP) and luteal phase (LP) in the menstrual cycle (MC). Fourteen healthy resistance-trained CrossFit® athletes and eumenorrheic women with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Mora Serrano, Jeimy, Chulvi Medrano, Iván, Martínez Guardado, Ismael, Alonso Aubin, Diego Alexandre
Format: article
Publication Date:2024
Country:España
Institution:Universidad Camilo José Cela (UCJC)
Repository:Depósito Digital e-UCJC
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ucjc.edu:20.500.12020/1414
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/13/5403
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12020/1414
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135403
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte
Follicular Phase
Luteal Phase
Training
Strength
Female
Response
32 Ciencias Médicas
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to compare the fast maximal dynamic strength, maximal dynamic strength, and muscular endurance changes between the follicular phase (FP) and luteal phase (LP) in the menstrual cycle (MC). Fourteen healthy resistance-trained CrossFit® athletes and eumenorrheic women without oral contraception participated in this study (age: 29.64 ± 3.95 years; height: 1.62 ± 0.04 m and mass: 60.43 ± 6.56 kg). A double cross-sectional and descriptive study was developed to evaluate strength, power, and muscular endurance performance in the FP (days 5 to 7) and LP (days 20 to 23). In each assessment, the subjects performed three countermovement jumps (CMJs) for assessing fast maximal dynamic strength using My Jump 2, one-repetition maximum (1-RM) on deep squat for maximal dynamic strength, and the Karen® protocol for muscular endurance. The data were analyzed using a paired sample t-test to determine whether there were any significant differences between FP and LP for all the assessments and the significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results revealed no significant differences between the FP and LP in performance: (a) fast maximal dynamic strength (FP: 0.27 ± 0.04 m; LP: 0.29 ± 0.04 m; t = 0.98; p = 0.34; ES = 0.26); (b) maximal dynamic strength (FP: 88.14 ± 12.60 kg; LP: 87.07 ± 12.51 kg; t = 0.90; p = 0.38; ES = 0.24); and (c) muscular endurance (FP: 459.43 ± 92.71 s; LP: 456.93 ± 110.68 s; t = 0.27; p = 0.78; ES = 0.07). CrossFit® performance is not altered during the MC in CrossFit® trained athletes. However, monitoring the MC and its symptoms could be used to adapt the training prescription to the needs and preferences of the athletes.