Cooperative innovation and crises: Foreign subsidiaries, state-owned enterprises, and domestic private firms
This article studies whether foreign subsidiaries (FSs) are able to cooperate for innovation with local partners during good and harsh economic times. It also enquires as to whether these companies and different types of domestic firms displayed similar cooperative behaviour during 2004–16. The peri...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/148550 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/148550 https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac038 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Business cycle Crisis Downturn MNE Foreign subsidiaries State-owned enterprises Cooperation for innovation Internationalisation of R&D |
| Sumario: | This article studies whether foreign subsidiaries (FSs) are able to cooperate for innovation with local partners during good and harsh economic times. It also enquires as to whether these companies and different types of domestic firms displayed similar cooperative behaviour during 2004–16. The period is divided into three sub-periods (boom, downturn, and recovery), and three logit models with panel data of a representative sample of Spanish firms are proposed. The ability of FSs to cooperate for innovation is maintained throughout the business cycle. These firms are better at cooperating than are unaffiliated firms but not significantly better than domestic business groups. State-owned enterprises strongly outperform both FSs and domestic private firms during the boom, the downturn, and the recovery. Unaffiliated domestic firms manage to cooperate during the boom and the recovery but not during the downturn. Predictors of cooperative innovation vary throughout the business cycle. The results contain policy implications |
|---|