Cohesión legislativa en la cámara más valorada: El caso del Senado de Chile, 1990-2018
In bicameral systems, it is wrong to apply findings from one chamber to the other. After discussing the determinants of legislative cohesion, we postulate 6 hypotheses that we test with the 4741 roll call votes in the Chilean Senate between 1990 and 2018. Ruling coalitions are more cohesive than opp...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| Repositorio: | GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/160237 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/160237 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | legislative behavior, legislative cohesion, bicameralism, Senate, Chile. comportamiento legislativo, cohesión legislativa, bicameralismo, Senado, Chile. |
| Sumario: | In bicameral systems, it is wrong to apply findings from one chamber to the other. After discussing the determinants of legislative cohesion, we postulate 6 hypotheses that we test with the 4741 roll call votes in the Chilean Senate between 1990 and 2018. Ruling coalitions are more cohesive than opposition coalitions. More important, more advanced bills and those introduced by the executive do not induce to more cohesion among coalitions. There is less cohesion in the last year, but not more cohesion in the first year of a term. |
|---|